Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited & Others V/S Harsh Ram Pal S/o G.L. Rampal
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Sagar Bhatiya
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 427
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2018
HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD V/S JAGDISH RAJ AND OTHERS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NITIN JAIN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No : 1166 of 2017Date of Institution: 03.10.2017Date of Decision : 28.05.20181. Jagdish Rai2. Darshan Kumar, both sons of Shri Khilu Ram3. Tej Mehender Singh son of Shri Nand Lal4. Smt. Meeta wife of Shr...
Case Number: 1166
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2018
M/S N.H CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD &ANOTHER V/S HARYANA OFFICERS COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate VARUN CHAWLA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,PANCHKULAConsumer Compliant No.:99 of 2016Date of Institution:29.4.2016Date of Decision:25.5.2018Haryana Officers Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. GH-2, Shikhar Apartments, Mansa Devi Complex, Sector-5, Panchkula through...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2018
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHROITY V/S PRERNA DEWAN
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate jaswant singh
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No:216 of 2017Date of Institution:27.09.2017Date of Decision:18.05.2018Prerna Dewan, Age 44 years wife of Sh. Sanjeev Dewan, R/o House No.1129, Sector-11, Panchkula, Haryana. ….Complainant...
Case Number: 216
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2018
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HUDA) V/S MOHAMMAD HALEEM
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1806 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 05/05/2016 in Appeal No. 229/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MOHAMMAD HALEEMS/O. SHRI BASHIR AHMED, R/O. FLAT NO. 5127/2, MHC, MANIMAJRA, CHANDIGARH-160101....
Case Number: 1806
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2018
MOTOROLA MOBILITY INDIA P LTD TOWER D DLF CYBER GREEN CYBER CITY GURUGRAM HARYANA V/S ASWATHY NAIR
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/18/65( Date of Filing : 01 Feb 2018 )1. ASWATHY NAIRDAYS RESIDENCE VARKEY TOWER JUDGES AVENUE KALOOR KOCHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MOTOROLA MOBILITY INDIA P LTD TOWER D DLF CYBER GREEN CYBER CITY ...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-06-2018
Haryana Rajya Parivahan Nigam V/S Ashok Kumar Prajpat
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 395 of 2016 Date of instt. 27.12.2016 Date of decision 16.05.2018Ashok Kumar Parjapat, resident of village Mohalla, District Hisar (Haryana)-125042. ……..Complainant. Versus1. Commission...
Case Number: 395
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2018
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited & Others V/S Indra Devi W/o Surender Pal
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Gigan Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Mohinder Singh
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Mohinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/17/67( Date of Filing : 15 Sep 2017 )InComplaint Case No. CC/14/2101. Mohinder SinghSon of Sh. Dharam Singh R/o House No. 8-C Narain Singh Park, Panipat...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Deve...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2018
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Rajpal
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Kuldeep Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.