Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panipat V/S Sh. Laxman
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Jagdeep Ghangas
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2018
Housing Board Haryana V/S Rajesh Kumar
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate Amit Verma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2018
Sub Divisional Officer, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Kuldeep Singh S/o Jai Pal
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Surender Singh Chauhan
Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.101 of 2016 Date of instt.31.03.2016 Date of decision:20.07.2018Kuldeep Singh son of Late Shri Jai Pal son of Shri Mansa Ram, resident of village Shahapur, Tehsil Indri, District Karnal. …&hellip...
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2018
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd V/S Raj Pal
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Ranpat Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate Narender Sachdeva
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Execution No.08 of 2017 Date of instt.: 08.02.2017 Date of decision 18.07.2018Raj Pal son of Shri Ram Chander resident of house no.300/9, Municipal Commttee Road, Taraori, Tehsil Nilokheri, Disrict Karnal.…..C...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2018
VEENA KUMARI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3950 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 16/05/2017 in Appeal No. 708/2016 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR HUDA, SECTOR-6, HUDA...
Case Number: 3950
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2018
PUSHPA DEVI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3950 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 16/05/2017 in Appeal No. 708/2016 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR HUDA, SECTOR-6, HUDA...
Case Number: 3951
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2018
Director General, Haryana State Transport V/S Ashok Kumar Parjapat
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/49/2018( Date of Filing : 19 Mar 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/01/2018 in Case No. CC/908/2017 of District DF-II)1. Ashok Kumar ParjapatChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Director General, Ha...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2018
Ministry of Transport, Haryana Govt. V/S Amardeep Singh Sandhu
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 94 OF 2018in CC/512/2017Amardeep Singh Sandhu and another Vs Ministry of Transport, Haryana Govt. and others BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA,...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kusum Lata
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Gupta
Respondant Advocate Gourav Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.251 of 2016 Date of instt. 29.08.2016 Date of decision 16.07.2018Kusum Lata wife of Shri Subhash Chander, resident of outside Jattan Gate, Karnal.…….Complainant. Versus1. Haryana Urban Dev...
Case Number: 251
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2018
Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Yogesh Nanda
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vinay Malik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/17/89( Date of Filing : 19 Dec 2017 )In444/20091. Yogesh NandaSon of Sh. Lajpat Rai Nanda, Proprietor M/S Panipat Card Board Industries, Village Ratipur, Distt. Panipat............Appellant(s)Versus1. U...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.