Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
1. The Managing Director, Bharati Airtel 2.Airtel India Head Quarters, Gurgaon 12001 Haryana (Delhi V/S Srinivasulu Vuppucherla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. B. Vijaya Krishna
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2019
Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Azad Singh
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Tejbir Deswal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2019
Honda motorcycle and scooter india pvt. ltd. haryana V/S Saket shroti
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate Vinod Tomar
Respondant Advocate K.K. Parasar
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2019
SKN Haryana City Gas Distribution Pvt Ltd V/S Rishubh Gupta
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sh Puneet
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2019
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Ramehar
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Naresh Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. Dharmender Kamboj
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 455/2017( Date of Filing : 04 Aug 2017 )1. Ramehar S/o Sh. Ganga Ram, R/o Type III Quarter No. 70, Revenue Colony, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.O...
Case Number: 455
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2019
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Romesh Vig
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sameer Gambhir
Respondant Advocate Sh. Yshapal C.A.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/159/2017( Date of Filing : 30 Nov 2017 )In1. Romesh Vig Sonepat road, Near Jagmohan Motors, Rohtak............Appellant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.SDO Sub Division...
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2019
State of Haryana through Chief Secretary Transport V/S Satwinder Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate D.R. Kaith
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/424/2018Date of Institution:28/08/2018Date of Decision:20/05/2019Satwinder Singh S/o Sh.Jasbir Singh, Resident of H.No.1776-B, Sector 43-B, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R S U S1....
Case Number: 424
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2019
The Branch Manager, Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank V/S Reena Devi W/o Shiv Kumar
Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank Haryana
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate R.K.Guggal
Respondant Advocate
CC No.168 of 2019.Smt. Reena Devi vs. Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank.Present: Complainant with Sh.RK Guggal, Adv. 1. Heard.2. Admitted facts of the complaint are, her husband Sh.Shiv Kumar was having saving bank account bearing No.8331011006213 in the respondent bank, photocopy ...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2019
THE STATE OF HARYANA V/S ROSHANI
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate SH. SANJAY KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/210/2018( Date of Filing : 05 Nov 2018 )In1. ROSHANI ROHTAK...........Appellant(s)Versus1. THE STATE OF HARYANAROHTAK...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian P...
Case Number: 210
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2019
ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUNDER SINGH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. BISLA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. NIRVIKAR VERMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2743 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/05/2016 in Appeal No. 1029/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUNDER SINGHS/O. SOHAN LAL, R/O. HOUSE NO. 103, SECTOR 15-A, HISAR,DISTRICT-HISARHARYANA ........
Case Number: 2743
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.