Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2959 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (ERSTWHILE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY) & ANR. V/S SATINDER MOHAN BOGRA & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANKIT SWARUP & JAWAD TARIQ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2285 OF 20191. SATINDER MOHAN BOGRA & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (ERSTWHILE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY) & ANR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'B...
Case Number: 2285
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2019
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Sirsa V/S Amit Kumar
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate Amit Verma
Respondant Advocate Vijay Sharma
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/18/199( Date of Filing : 19 Jul 2018 )1. Amit KumarAmit Kumar S/o Sh.Indersain R/o V. Mithisurera, teh. Ellenabad , Distt. Sirsa SirsaHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, SirsaDakshin Haryana Bijli Vitr...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2019
Haryana Beej Vikas Nigam Limited and Other V/S Vikas Yadav
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sh Dalbir Singh
Case Number: 625
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2019
Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority and Other V/S Murti Devi
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Aneja
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashok Malik
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2020
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam V/S Kiran Mehta
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh. R L Sehra
Respondant Advocate Sh Anirudh
Case Number: 285
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2019
Department of State Transport, Haryana V/S Manisha Rana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/225/2019( Date of Filing : 01 Oct 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/08/2019 in Case No. cc/695/2019 of District DF-II)1. Manisha Ranadaughter of Sh. R.S. Rana, C-3/31, DLF Valley Panchkula, Haryana........
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 25-11-2019
The S.D.O. Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Karam Singh
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 773 of 2019 Date of instt. 21.11.2019 Date of Decision 22.11.2019Karam Singh son of Shri Rati Ram, resident of Village Budha Khera, Tehsil Nilokheri, District Karnal. …….Complainant V...
Case Number: 773
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2019
State of Haryana V/S Krishan
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Dharmender Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sushil Kumar
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 725/2017( Date of Filing : 22 Dec 2017 )1. Krishan S/o Sh. Raj Kumar R/o village Kheri Tehsil and District Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. State of Haryanathrough its Deputy Commissione...
Case Number: 725
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2019
HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD V/S DEEPINDER SINGH
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.S.SIDHU
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No.568 of 2018 Date of the Institution: 11.10.2018 Date of Decision: 19.11.2019Deepinder Singh Sekhon son of late Sh. Kulwant Singh, resident of House No.3212, Sector 32-D, Chandigarh.…..C...
Case Number: 568
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2019
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kamlesh kumari
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. L.S. Rathhee
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.