company-name-logo

Haryana

Latest Judgments

Total 2959 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.

Punjab

General Manager, Haryana State Transport V/S Ashok Kumar Parjapat

Transport   Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 696

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 29-12-2020

Haryana

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Hardeep

Haryana  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Kumar Hooda

Respondant Advocate Sh. Pardeep Ahlawat

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/110( Date of Filing : 01 Mar 2019 )1. HardeepS/o Sh. Pardeep R/o Dalal Complex, near Raj Motors, Subhash Nagar, Delhi Road, Rohtak. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitra...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 01-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2020

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Rajnish Gupta

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Vineet Kapoor

Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Execution No.14 of 2019 Date of instt. 25.01.2019 Date of Decision 26.11.20201. Rajnish Gupta son of Shri Sat Parkash Gupta;2. Smt.Anju Gupta;3. Neeraj Singla;4. Ankit Singla, all residents of H.No.31-A, Cham...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 25-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2020

Karnataka

Case Number: 52

|

Date of Filing: 12-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 07-12-2020

NCDRC

RAKESH ARYA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 722 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 29/11/2018 in Complaint No. 404/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS............Appellant(s)Versus1. RAKESH ARYA..............

Case Number: 722

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 23-11-2020

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority. V/S Meenu

Haryana  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rishi Deswal

Respondant Advocate Sh. Shakti Singh

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. 646/2017( Date of Filing : 14 Nov 2017 )1. Meenu D/o Sh. Raghbir Singh R/o H.No. 830/30, Shri Nagar Colony, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Development Authority.through its ...

Case Number: 646

|

Date of Filing: 14-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-11-2020

Haryana

Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Atul Jain

Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. J.B. Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 15-07-2020

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2020

NCDRC

ASHWANI BAMBA & ANR. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PANCHKULA & ORS.

Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate M/S. KUKREJA ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1277 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/12/2007 in Appeal No. 649/2007 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PANCHKULA & ORS.Town and Country Department, New Harya...

Case Number: 1277

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2020

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Rohit Malik

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 09-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2020

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S S. K. Shreevastava

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 09-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 06-11-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.