company-name-logo

Haryana

Latest Judgments

Total 2959 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.

Haryana

Haryana Shahri Vikas Pradhikaran V/S Sanjogita W/o Partap Singh

Haryana  

Court Name: Kurukshetra

Appelant Advocate Rohtash Jangam

Respondant Advocate

Sanjogita versus HSVPPresent: Shri Rohtash Jangam Advocate for the complainant. Shri Anuj Garg Advocate for Ops. File taken up on the application moved on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement that he does not want to pursue with the ...

Case Number: 242

|

Date of Filing: 30-07-2020

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2021

Haryana

HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN. V/S LACHHMAN DASS SHARMA.

Haryana  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate VANEET KUMAR SHARMA & VISHAL SAINI

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No.:36 of 2021Date of Institution:22.01.2021Date of Decision:14.07.2021Lachhman Dass Sharma son of Shri Nasib Chand Sharma, resident of House No.226, MDC, Complex, Sector-4, Panchkula (Haryan...

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2021

|

Date of Upload: 23-07-2021

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development & Others V/S Birma Devi W/o Ram Gopal Sharma

Haryana  

Court Name: Faridabad

Appelant Advocate Dharmandra Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 89

|

Date of Filing: 11-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 12-08-2021

Haryana

Rajbir Incharge Haryana Seed V/S Karambir S/o Mula Ram

Haryana  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Jai Singh kaushik

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2019

|

Date of Upload: 07-07-2021

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Saroj

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Neelam Yadav

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 65

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 15-07-2021

Haryana

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam V/S Suresh Kumar

Haryana  

Court Name: Fatehabad

Appelant Advocate Pankaj Bansal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 141

|

Date of Filing: 18-06-2021

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2021

Haryana

Managing Director, Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam V/S Jitender

Haryana  

Court Name: Charkhi Dadri

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rahul Kumar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 135

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2021

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2022

Chandigarh

Directorate, Haryana State Transport V/S Ashok Kumar Prajapat

Transport   Haryana  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:253/2021Date of Institution:15.04.2021Date of Decision:04.06.2021Ashok Kumar Parjapat R/o Village Mohalla, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar (Haryana) 125042. …..ComplainantVersus1] Directo...

Case Number: 253

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2021

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2021

Chandigarh

Haryana Roadways V/S Harish Goyal

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sunil Garg & Sanyam Bhardwaj Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHAppeal No.194 of 2019Date of Institution03.09.2019Date of Decision17.05.2021Harish Goyal S/o Sh. Subhash Chander Goyal, R/o H.No.2147, Sector 69, SAS Nagar, Mohali.Ashish Gupta S/o Sh.Naresh Kumar Gupta, R/o ...

Case Number: 194

|

Date of Filing: 03-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 24-05-2021

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HISAR & 2 ORS. V/S MOHAN LAL GOYAL

Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANINDYA MALHOTRA & MS. DEEPTI GULATI

Respondant Advocate MR. PIYUSH HANS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4394 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/12/2011 in Appeal No. 300/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MOHAN LAL GOYALS/o Shri Kripa Ram, Presently R/o H.No-906, Sector 15-II GURGAONHARYANA............

Case Number: 4394

|

Date of Filing: 20-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-05-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.