Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2935 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam V/S Karan Singh
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate Azad Singh Marothiya
Respondant Advocate Harnam Singh Bishnoi
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2021
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd., V/S Rajender
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Tarun Hooda
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajpal Lineman
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/513( Date of Filing : 04 Nov 2020 )1. Rajenderaged 53 years S/o Sh. Ram Kishan R/o Village Chamarian, Tehsil and Distt. Rohtak (Haryana)............Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli ...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2020
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2021
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitan Nigam Limited V/S Amardeep
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No.723 of 2019 Date of instt.23.10.2019 Date of Decision 28.09.2021.Amardeep son of Shri Dalel Singh, resident of house no.986, sector-4, Housing Board Colony, Karnal (Haryana) …….Compl...
Case Number: 723
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2021
Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran V/S Gulshan Chawla
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. N.K. Singhal
Respondant Advocate Sh. K.K. Luthra
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/20/67( Date of Filing : 25 Aug 2020 )InComplaint Case No. CC/19/3381. Gulshan ChawlaS/o Sh. Sant Lal Chawla aged 41 years R/o 1353B Ward No. 19, Opposite Reliance Fresh, Huda Complex, Opp...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2021
Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran V/S Ruchi
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. N.K. Singhal
Respondant Advocate Sh. K.K. Luthra
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/20/68( Date of Filing : 25 Aug 2020 )InComplaint Case No. CC/19/3371. RuchiW/o Gulshan chawla aged 37 years R/o 1353B Ward No. 19, Opposite Reliance Fresh, Huda Complex, Opposite Palika B...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2021
HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP) V/S JATINDER JAIN.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate ANIRUDH KUSH
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No.:383 of 2021Date of Institution:13.09.2021Date of Decision:27.09.2021Jatinder Jain, age 63 years, son of Sh. Sham Lal Jain, resident of 2148, Sector 35-C, Chandigarh. ……......
Case Number: 383
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2021
Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran V/S Vikas Chawla
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.N. Singhal
Respondant Advocate Sh. Mukesh Parmar
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/20/66( Date of Filing : 21 Aug 2020 )InComplaint Case No. CC/19/3391. Vikas ChawlaS/o Sh. Sant Lal Chawla aged 38 years R/o 1353B Ward No. 19, Opposite Reliance Fresh, Huda Complex, Oppos...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2021
Haryana Urban Development Authority. V/S Amandeep
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Hooda
Respondant Advocate Sh. Shakti Singh
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. 718/2017( Date of Filing : 21 Dec 2017 )1. AmandeepS/o Sh. Sunder Singh R/o H.No. 622,sector 15-A Hissar(HR)............Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Development Authority.Chief Administrato...
Case Number: 718
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2021
The Competent Authority, J.C.B India, Haryana V/S Bhaktahari Tunga, aged 52 years
Court Name: Baleshwar
Appelant Advocate Sj. Manoj Kumar Nayak & Others
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASOREAT- COLLECTORATE CAMPUS, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001Complaint Case No. CC/10/2021( Date of Filing : 18 Jan 2021 )1. Bhaktahari Tunga, aged 52 yearsS/o. Bauri Bandhu Tunga, At- Mendhra, P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore.Odisha........
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2021
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2021
1. PANASONIC INDIA LTD. SURAT 2.PANASONIC INDIA LTD. HARYANA 3. R.A. ELECTRONICS BHARUCH V/S SANGANI SANDEEPKUMAR LABHUBHAI
Court Name: Bharuch
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2021
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.