company-name-logo

Haryana

Latest Judgments

Total 2935 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.

Haryana

RAN SINGH AND ANOTHER V/S SARVA HARYANA GRAMIN BANK

Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank   Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate ANJU SAINI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 331

|

Date of Filing: 09-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 08-12-2021

Haryana

HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN V/S THE KRISHNA CGHS LTD.

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate HIMANSHU UPADHYAYA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 45

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2021

|

Date of Upload: 23-11-2021

Haryana

Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Meena Kumari

Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Naresh Kumar

Respondant Advocate Surinder Saini

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No.562 of 2020 Date of instt. 09.12.2020 Date of Decision: 17.11.2021Meena Kumari wife of Shri Naresh Kumar aged 43 years resident of village Uncha Samana Tehsil Gharaunda District Karnal....

Case Number: 562

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2020

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2021

Haryana

The Estate Manager, Housing Board Haryana V/S Chetan

Housing Board   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Kamboj

Respondant Advocate Virender Sachdeva

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 478 of 2019 Date of instt.01.08.2019 Date of Decision 17.11.2021Chetan son of Shri Kamal Kishore resident of house no.2388, Roop Colony, Sadar Bazar, Karnal. …….Complainant. Versus...

Case Number: 478

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2021

Haryana

Haryana Shahri Vikas Pardhikaran V/S Smt. Aprajita

Haryana  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Sharma

Respondant Advocate Sh. K.K. Luthra

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 01-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 30-11-2021

Haryana

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S RAJINDER KUMAR SHARMA.

Haryana  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate CHANDERHAS YADAV

Respondant Advocate

Before the District Consumer, Dispute Redressal, commission, Panchkula.Consumer Complaint No.:145 of 2021Date of Institution:22.02.2021Date of Decision:16.11.2021Rajinder Kumar Sharma S/o Late Sh. Rameshwar Dass Sharma permanent resident of Village and Post Office Hangola, Tehsil...

Case Number: 145

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 03-12-2021

Haryana

THE DIRECTOR ,UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM. V/S JOGINDER KUMAR.

Haryana  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate CHANDERHAS YADAV

Respondant Advocate

Before the District Consumer, Dispute Redressal, commission, Panchkula.Consumer Complaint No.:146 of 2021Date of Institution:22.02.2021Date of Decision:16.11.2021Joginder Kumar S/o Late Sh. Rameshwar Dass Sharma permanent resident of Village and Post Office Hangola, Tehsil Raipur...

Case Number: 146

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 03-12-2021

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sunny

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Subhash Shelat

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 12-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2021

Haryana

UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S MADAN LAL.

Haryana  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate ASHOK KUMAR.

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No.:392 of 2021Date of Institution:22.09.2021Date of Decision:15.11.2021Madan Lal, aged 37 years, son of Shri Jagir, resident of Village Devar, Post Office Garhi Kotaha, Tehsil Raipur Rani, ...

Case Number: 392

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2021

Haryana

Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank V/S Jogi Ram

Haryana  

Court Name: Hisar

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rohit S. Malhan

Respondant Advocate Sh. S.K.Mittal

Case Number: 120

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2021

|

Date of Upload: 30-11-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.