Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Naresh Chander
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh. P S Chandan
Respondant Advocate Sh. Hemant Sharma
Case Number: 281
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2022
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Umang Mital
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh S K Singla
Respondant Advocate Smt Meena Hooda
Case Number: 259
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2022
Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) V/S Rajeev Sharma and Other
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Shri Tilak Raj Arora
Respondant Advocate Sh R K Garg
Case Number: 149
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2022
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Tripta Sachdev
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2022
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SANJEEV GOYAL
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3298 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 21/10/2015 in Appeal No. 680/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SANJEEV GOYALS/O SH.TARLOCHAN LAL, R/O H.NO-1070,SECTOR-15PANCHKULAHARYANA...........Petitioner...
Case Number: 3298
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2022
Late Sh. Jatinder Kumar V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Umesh Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionU.T., Chandigarh.RA/7/2021 alongwith MA/753/2021Haryana Urban DevelopmentAuthorityVsLate Sh. Jatinder KumarBEFORE:JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENTPADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBERRAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBERPRESENT (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCIN...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2021
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
Late Sh. Jatinder Kumar V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Umesh Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionU.T., Chandigarh.RA/7/2021 alongwith MA/753/2021Haryana Urban DevelopmentAuthorityVsLate Sh. Jatinder KumarBEFORE:JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENTPADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBERRAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBERPRESENT (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCIN...
Case Number: 753
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2021
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . V/S SMT.INDRA SOBTI.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate DALWAR CHAUDHARY.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:30 of 2018Date of Institution:24.07.2018Date of Decision:18.01.2018Smt. Indra Sobti, w/o Sh. H.K.Sobti, Sobti Nursing Home, Red Road, Kurukshetra. …….Decree Holder...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2022
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S ATUL MARWAHA & 2 ORS.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. FERRY SAFAT
Respondant Advocate MR. PIYUSH HANS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3960 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1540/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ATUL MARWAHA & 2 ORS.S/o Sh.N.K Marwha House no-204,Phase III-B-1MOHALIPUNJAB2. Anuj Marwaha,S...
Case Number: 3960
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2022
Haryana Urban Development Authority and Others V/S Raj Kumar Wadhwa
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Shri Sushant Giri
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 641
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.