Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S MAHINDER SINGH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3834 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 06/11/2009 in Appeal No. 2244/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MAHINDER SINGHResident of H. No. 55, Jagan Nath ViharPanipatHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 3834
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2011
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAJINDER SINGH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAUTAM GODARA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1178 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 2769/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJINDER SINGHR/O VILLAGE PATI LAYANA TEHSIL SAMALKHAPANIPATHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 1178
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2011
JAGJIT GUPTA AND ANR. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate D.K.SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1484 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 18/07/2006 in Appeal No. 1126/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. JAGJIT GUPTA AND ANR.........
Case Number: 1484
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2011
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S AMRIT LAL BANSAL & ORS.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL MITTAL
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1377 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 11/12/2009 in Appeal No. 49/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. AMRIT LAL BANSAL & ORS.Plot No. 458, Sector-7Ambala CityHaryana2. THE AMBALA URBAN ESTATE SOCIET...
Case Number: 1377
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. V/S DEEPAK KUMAR GOSWAMI
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. O.P.KHADARIA
Respondant Advocate MR. SURYANARAYANA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 30/08/2006 in Appeal No. 1876/2000 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DEEPAK KUMAR GOSWAMISOLAR PAINTS E-174, GREATER KAILASH -I, NEW DELHI - ...........Petition...
Case Number: 2933
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Railway Haryana Indian Railway
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate A.K.TEWARI
Respondant Advocate NA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 79 OF 20041. INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Fo...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2004
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2010
Smt. Naraini Devi V/S Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. No. RBT/FA/323/2009FIRST APPEAL NO. FA of 2009InO.A. NO.FA/1330/2007 1. Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development AuthoritySector...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SURENDER KUMAR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV BHATNAGAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2027 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/01/2010 in Appeal No. 3493/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SURENDER KUMARR/o. House No. 88, Des Raj ColonyPanipatHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 2027
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S M/S. G.M. WORSTED SPINING
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUN K. MALHOTRA & RAJAN KHANNA
Respondant Advocate MS. SHWATA MISHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 78 OF 1999 1. M/S. G.M. WORSTED SPININGMILLS P. LTD. OFFICE AT B - 86 GREATER KAILASH PART - I NEW DELHI - 110048 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAUTHORITY HUDA THROUGH ...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-1999
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2010
INDU SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 23 Mar 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1182/2010(Against the Order dated 18/12/2009 in Appeal No. 2365/2006 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANRThrough its Chief Adm...
Case Number: 1182
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2010
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.