Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
SUNIT KUMARI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL HOODA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3777 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 12/12/2005 in Appeal No. 1048/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, GURGAON -...........Petitioner(...
Case Number: 3777
|
Date of Filing: 15-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BHAGAT SINGH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 643 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 13/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1356/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BHAGAT SINGH-2. BHAGAT SINGHC/O. JAI TAWAN TEA STALL COURT COMPLEX BHIWANI TEHSILR/O. VILLAGE J...
Case Number: 643
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S SH. GANGA BHARDWAJ
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3779 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 31/05/2011 in Appeal No. 552/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. GANGA BHARDWAJS/o Sh Brij Lal Sharma, R/o J-29, Sarita Vihar,New DelhiDelhi...........Petit...
Case Number: 3779
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S HARI KISHAN
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JAGDEEP SINGH DHAKLA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 224 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/11/2010 in Appeal No. 861/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARI KISHANS/o Shri Chattar Singh, h.No- 1480, Sector-9 Urban EstateKarnal Haryana...........Pet...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2012
JAGMOHAN GUPTA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3353 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 08/07/2006 in Appeal No. 1780/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS, ESTATE OFFICE , HUDA , KURUKSHETRA -...........
Case Number: 3353
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2012
BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURIS PRERITUS
Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL PRUTHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1036 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 13/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1354/2003 of the State Commission Punjab)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA -.....
Case Number: 1036
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BAL KISHAN AND ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K.GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1894 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 02/05/2007 in Appeal No. 54/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BAL KISHAN AND ANR.BAL KISHAN 2 RMESH CHANDER BOTH RESIDENTS OF 55. GREEN PARK HISAR ............
Case Number: 1894
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 04-11-2011
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. V/S M/S. DAULAT RAM HOTEL PRIVATE LIMITED
Development Authority Hotel Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 767 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 01/11/2006 in Complaint No. 54/2006 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. DAULAT RAM HOTEL PRIVATE LIMITEDMANAGING DIRECTOR, SHRI ASHWANI KUMAR 1644, URBAN ESTATE - II HIS...
Case Number: 767
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2011
AMRIT BHATIA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY PAL, ADV.
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2491 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 20/10/2006 in Appeal No. 2724/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PANCHKULA THROUGH ITS CHIEF THROUGH ADMINISTRATOR, SECTOR-...
Case Number: 2491
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2011
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S DR. ANAND PRAKASH MITTAL
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate NIRAJ SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2505 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/03/2011 in Appeal No. 2070/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DR. ANAND PRAKASH MITTALS/o Shri P.L Mittal, 334 Loha mandi, TehsilHissarHaryana...........Pet...
Case Number: 2505
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2011
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.