company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S RESHMA DEVI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIRENDRA SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2011 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/01/2012 in Appeal No. 558/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RESHMA DEVIW/o Sh Om Prakash R/o House No-856 Sector-3FaridabadHaryana...........Petitioner(s)V...

Case Number: 2011

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 28-08-2012

NCDRC

THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BOUTIQUE INTERNATIONAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIJAY MANGLA & N.P. SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 331 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/07/2011 in Complaint No. 36/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BOUTIQUE INTERNATIONALPlot No. 553, Sector-37, Pace city-II,having Registered office at 202, Padma ...

Case Number: 331

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2012

NCDRC

BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. JURIS PRERITUS

Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL PRUTHI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 309 OF 2012 IN RP/1036/20071. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PR...

Case Number: 309

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-08-2012

NCDRC

M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 451 OF 2012 IN FA/35/19991. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAI...

Case Number: 451

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2012

NCDRC

M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR RAVINDRA BANA

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 452 OF 2012 IN FA/35/19991. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAI...

Case Number: 452

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DIMPAL YADAV

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP PHOGAT

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1251 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/09/2011 in Appeal No. 882/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DIMPAL YADAVW/o Shri Ajit Singh, R/o H.No-115,Sector- 5HansiHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 1251

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR V/S INDRA GUPTA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MOTISH KR. SINGH

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3522 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/06/2007 in Appeal No. 2231/2002 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. INDRA GUPTAHOUSE NO. B-1153, SECTOR-17B, IFFCCO COLONY GURGAON...........Petitioner(s)Versu...

Case Number: 3522

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2007

|

Date of Upload: 10-07-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S SMT. JYOTI SHARMA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. CHANDRA & CHANDRA ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3309 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 05/07/2011 in Appeal No. 864/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SMT. JYOTI SHARMAD/o Sh Ramesh Kumar Sharma, Now Mrs JyotiSethi, R/o H.No-37, Rajpur Road,Gwali...

Case Number: 3309

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2012

NCDRC

ESTATE OFFICER , HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S RAJ KUMAR GUPTA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. CHANDRA & CHANDRA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3322 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 13/03/2009 in Appeal No. 2248/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJ KUMAR GUPTAS/o Sh Khubi Ram, R/o B-42 Chander Nagar, Tha GhaziabadU.P...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 3322

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 05-07-2012

Chandigarh

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S M/s Daulat Ram Hotel (P) Ltd.

Development Authority   Hotel   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh.Neeraj Pal Sharma, Adv. for the complainant

Respondant Advocate Sh. Sikander Bakshi, Adv. for the OPs

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019CONSUMER CASE NO. 54 of 2006 1. M/s Daulat Ram Hotel (P) Ltd.1644, Urban Estate-II, Hisar through its Managing Director Sh. Ashwani Kumar ...........

Case Number: 54

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.