Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SANJAY KUMAR JANGRA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2815 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/03/2012 in Appeal No. 203/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SANJAY KUMAR JANGRAS/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Jangra R/o Village Dhana LadanpurBhiwaniHaryana........
Case Number: 2815
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. V/S DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND ORS.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3764
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. V/S SMT. SUDESH KUMARI AND ORS.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3765
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. V/S DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND ORS.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3766
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
KANTA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3218 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/02/2012 in Appeal No. 149/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Theough its Estate Officer,Sector-14GurgaonHaryana............
Case Number: 3218
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2012
THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHRI AMRIK SINGH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR.NEERAJ PAL SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 31/01/2011 in Complaint No. 02/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SHRI AMRIK SINGHr/o: village & post office : Pali, Tehisil: Narnaud Hisar Haryana...........Appella...
Case Number: 150
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DR. DAULAT RAM SAINI
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH MITTRA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3819 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 18/10/2006 in Appeal No. 151/2001 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DR. DAULAT RAM SAINIR/O D. P. S. I. CAMPUS, SECTOR XII, R. K. PURAM, NEW DELHI...........Pet...
Case Number: 3819
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S GANDHI KARYAKARTA SEHAKARI SAMITI
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MEENAKSHI MIDHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3858 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/07/2011 in Appeal No. 2882/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GANDHI KARYAKARTA SEHAKARI SAMITI197 Green Park, Panipat, through its PresidentPanipatHaryana....
Case Number: 3858
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S SUMESH MITTAL
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 919 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 329/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUMESH MITTALS/o Shri Satya Pal, R/o H.No513 Gali No-5 Gurbax ColonyPatialaPunjab...........Peti...
Case Number: 919
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
ESTATE OFFIER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S PRAVEEN KUMAR ARORA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1911 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Appeal No. 462/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. PRAVEEN KUMAR ARORAH.No-1326,Sector-17FaridabadHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ESTATE O...
Case Number: 1911
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.