company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHRENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1644 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/09/2011 in Appeal No. 899/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR.Village & PO Chappra Tehsil ,Nuhan GurgaonHaryana2. DushyantVillage & P...

Case Number: 1644

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR V/S INDRA GUPTA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MOHIT KR. SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 566 OF 2012 IN RP/3522/20071. INDRA GUPTA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDI...

Case Number: 566

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 26-06-2013

NCDRC

THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHRI AMRIK SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR.NEERAJ PAL SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2013 IN FA/150/20111. SHRI AMRIK SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRE...

Case Number: 28

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S SUMITRA SUDAN

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1643 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/09/2011 in Appeal No. 897/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUMITRA SUDANR/o Shop No-250,Sector-7,MarketFaridabadHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HA...

Case Number: 1643

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S AMIT MARWAH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MEENAKSHI ARORA

Respondant Advocate MS. CHARU SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3126 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/10/2008 in Appeal No. 803/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. AMIT MARWAHS/o Parmanand, R/o 1189,NHBCPanipatHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYANA U...

Case Number: 3126

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2013

NCDRC

VIBHA SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2334 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1831/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator,Sector-6PanchkulaHary...

Case Number: 2334

|

Date of Filing: 19-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER V/S SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERS

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 786 OF 2012 IN RP/3764/20111. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER...........Res...

Case Number: 786

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER V/S SMT. SUDESH KUMARI AND OTHERS

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 787 OF 2012 IN RP/3765/20111. SMT. SUDESH KUMARI AND OTHERS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER...........Responden...

Case Number: 787

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RANI DEVI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. G. I . SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2942 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/06/2012 in Appeal No. 2242/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RANI DEVIW/o Shri Laxmi Chand Gupta, R/o House No. 884, Sector 7, Ambala CityHaryana.............

Case Number: 2942

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUKHBIR SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MANOJ KUMAR SOOD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2920 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 05/04/2011 in Appeal No. 1075/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUKHBIR SINGHS/o Shri Ami Chand, R/o of House no- 1922, Sector- 8FaridabadHaryana...........Pe...

Case Number: 2920

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 02-11-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.