company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S RAMA NAND DHAKA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1569 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/04/2013 in Appeal No. 153/2008 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/2738/20131. RAMA NAND DHAKAS/O SHREE CHAND, R/O VILLAGE SERULI, P.O JAKHULISONEPATHARYAN...

Case Number: 1569

|

Date of Filing: 22-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S RAJINDER KUMAR

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. SUSHILA THAKRAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4012 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/07/2012 in Appeal No. 367/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJINDER KUMARSH. KRISHAN CHAND, R/O HOUSE NO.462, SECTOR 13, HUDA,KARNAL HARYANA...........Pet...

Case Number: 4012

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-08-2013

NCDRC

GEETA SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1016 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/12/2012 in Appeal No. 1163/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1870/20131. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, HUDAREWARIHA...

Case Number: 1016

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 07-08-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S INDU BALA SATIJA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VENKAT SUBRAMONIAM T.R.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1506 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/01/2012 in Appeal No. 879/20006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. INDU BALA SATIJAW/o Sri Dharmvir Satija R/o 443 Dr Mukherji Nagar Near M.C,Primary SchoolDelhi...

Case Number: 1506

|

Date of Filing: 12-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-07-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S DHARAMPAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ASHISH UPADHYAY & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4171 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Appeal No. 262/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DHARAMPALS/o Late Shri Ram Lal, R/o BG-5/70B, Paschim ViharNEW DELHI - 110063DELHI...........Pe...

Case Number: 4171

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHRENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1644 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/09/2011 in Appeal No. 899/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR.Village & PO Chappra Tehsil ,Nuhan GurgaonHaryana2. DushyantVillage & P...

Case Number: 1644

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHRENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 194 OF 2013 IN RP/1644/20121. HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. C...

Case Number: 194

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-04-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S BABU RAM

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH KUMAR YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 591 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/04/2012 in Appeal No. 2084/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1046/20131. BABU RAMS/O SH LEEL RAM, R/O VILLAGE & POST OFFICE DHANDO, NEAR KANINAMAHEND...

Case Number: 591

|

Date of Filing: 14-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-03-2013

NCDRC

ANAND SINGH & ANR. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Complaint No. 46/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.SECTOR-6, PANCHKULAHARYANA2. THE ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA ...

Case Number: 141

|

Date of Filing: 19-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 26-03-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S LAXMI NARAIN

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3971 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/05/2012 in Appeal No. 1722/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. LAXMI NARAINThrough GPA Ved Prakash , S/o Shri Chander Pal, R/o H.No-842/18, Naharpur Road,Shi...

Case Number: 3971

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.