company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

NCDRC

LAKHWINDER KAUR V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4026 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1992/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...

Case Number: 4026

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2014

NCDRC

DALIP KAUR V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4044 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1994/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...

Case Number: 4044

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2014

NCDRC

GURMIT KAUR V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4045 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1995/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...

Case Number: 4045

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2014

NCDRC

ABDUL V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4174 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1092/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, Sector-6PANCHKULAHAR...

Case Number: 4174

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2013

NCDRC

THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR V/S RAKESH KUMAR GOYAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2596 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/03/2012 in Appeal No. 918/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAKESH KUMAR GOYALS/o Shri C.P Goyal Through GPA- Shri Vijay Dogra R/o 1181, Sector-4, U.EGurga...

Case Number: 2596

|

Date of Filing: 16-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 26-11-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S JITENDER PAL SIHAG

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. LE-AMBIENCE LEGAL SOLUTIONS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3494 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/07/2012 in Appeal No. 858/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/6214/20131. JITENDER PAL SIHAGS/O SH.S.R SIHAG, R/O H.NO-845,SECTOR- 8PABCHKULAHARYANA.....

Case Number: 3494

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-10-2013

NCDRC

GULJARI LAL V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN & MS. SUSHILA THAKRAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2699 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 11/12/2012 in Appeal No. 1219/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/4583/2013,IA/4584/20131. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS ESTATE...

Case Number: 2699

|

Date of Filing: 19-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 23-10-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S GAJENDER KUMAR

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANKIT JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S BHADRAN & BHARAT SWAROP SHARMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4775 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 08/08/2012 in Appeal No. 2060/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GAJENDER KUMARS/o Shri Girdhar Gopal, R/o H.No-173 HOPE Apts, Sector-15-(II) GurgaonGURGAOANHA...

Case Number: 4775

|

Date of Filing: 17-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2013

NCDRC

MEGHDOOT CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. V/S ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3363 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/01/2012 in Appeal No. 704/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/5981/2013,IA/5982/2013,IA/5983/20131. ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT...

Case Number: 3363

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S LAXMI NARAIN

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2013 IN RP/3971/20121. LAXMI NARAIN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PR...

Case Number: 360

|

Date of Filing: 28-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 10-09-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.