company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sneh Kaushal W/o Naresh Kaushal

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Sh. Ashok Kapoor

Respondant Advocate Pawan Kajal, S.K. Kamboj

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.198 of 2013 Date of instt:25.4.2013 Date of decision:14.09.2015Smt. Sneh Kaushal wife of Sh.Naresh Kaushal resident of house no.884/6, U.E.Karnal. ……….Complainant. VersusHaryana Urb...

Case Number: 198

|

Date of Filing: 26-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2015

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S KARAMVEER SINGH & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2318 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 08/03/2010 in Appeal No. 890/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KARAMVEER SINGH & ANR.Both Residents of VPO ALalwalpur Tehsil Palwal, Distt. Faridabad, Through...

Case Number: 2318

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 18-12-2014

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S KAMLA DEVI & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION REVISION PETITION NO. 43 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 19/05/2014 in Appeal No. 106/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KAMLA DEVI & ANR.W/O SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MAHAJAN, R/O KOTHI NO-968,SECTOR-4PANCHKULAHARYA...

Case Number: 43

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2014

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S VIJAY KUMAR

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2110 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 15/03/2013 in Appeal No. 159/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. VIJAY KUMARH.NO-267,SECTOR-10PANCHKULAHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEV...

Case Number: 2110

|

Date of Filing: 23-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2014

Haryana

Chief Administrator Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Prem Chand

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate sh. A.K. Nagpal

Respondant Advocate Sh. R.R. Sharma

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 321 of 2012 Date of instt.6.7.2012 Date of decision: 23.02.2015Prem Chand Saluja son of Shri J.R.Saluja resident of house no. 1531, Sector 13, Urban Estate, Karnal. ………..Complainant...

Case Number: 321

|

Date of Filing: 06-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 16-04-2015

NCDRC

AMRIT BHATIA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY PAL, ADV.

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 235 OF 2014 IN RP/2491/20071. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...........Appellants(s)Versus1. AMRIT BHATIA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENTHON...

Case Number: 235

|

Date of Filing: 24-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 12-05-2014

NCDRC

ANASHWAR CHOPRA & ANR. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1733 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 26/09/2013 in Appeal No. 666/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, KARNALHARYANA...........Petition...

Case Number: 1733

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2014

NCDRC

ASHOK KUMAR & 2 ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHAKAR DWIVEDI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 126 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 3516/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARY...

Case Number: 126

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 05-05-2014

NCDRC

ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S N.K. MATHUR

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION REVISION PETITION NO. 4 OF 2014(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission Haryana)1. N.K. MATHURH. NR. C-4-H/79, GF, JANAKPURINEW DELHI-110058...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ESTATE OFFICE...

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 28-02-2014

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR V/S INDRA GUPTA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MOTISH KR. SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 506 OF 2013 IN RP/3522/20071. INDRA GUPTA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MRS. REKHA GUPTA, PRESIDING MEM...

Case Number: 506

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.