Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Surinder Pal singh
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate Sh. J.M. Manchanda
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 152
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 08-10-2015
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kamlesh Rani
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate Sh.J.M. Manchanda
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 156
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 06-10-2015
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S M/S Khanna Textiles
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Malik
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2015
Abhishek Haryana Employees Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana Society Cooperative Cooperative
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULARevision Petition No.01 of 2015Date ofInstitution :07.01.2015Date of Decision:19.08.20151. Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Chief Administrator, Head Office, Sector 6, Panchkula.2. Estate Officer, Ha...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2015
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Dinesh Kumar Sharma
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Manoj Tehri
Respondant Advocate
Learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement that due to some technical reasons he do not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraw the same with the liberty to file a fresh on the samecauseof action. keeping in view on the statement of learned counsel fo...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2015
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . V/S RAVINDER KUMAR THUKRAL.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate ABHINEET TANEJA.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Execution Application No:11 of 2015Date of Institution:10.03.2015Date of Decision:19.05.2015Ravinder Kumar Thukral s/o Sh.Ramgopal Thukral, R/o House No.526/19, Arya Nagar, Hansi, Distt. Hisar.….ComplainantVe...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2015
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BALBIR S/O NAND LAL
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate ANKUR TYAGI
Respondant Advocate SATWAN MANN
Balbir s/o Sh. Nand Lal V/s Haryana urban Developerment Authority Case no. EA/115/2013Present: Shri Ankur Tyagi Adv. For complainant -DHOrder On 31.03.2015 Ld. Counsel for the complainant –DH has made a statement that he does not want to continue with the present execution ...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2015
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S JAI PAL RATHEE S/O SUNEHRA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate DEEPAK
Respondant Advocate SATWAN MANN
Jai Pal Rathee V/s Haryana urban Developerment Authority Case no. EA/138/2013Present: Shri karamvir Singh for the complainant-DH jaipal Rathee.Order Shri Karamvir Singh has made a statement on 31.03.2015 that he has received the cheque no. 515423 dated dated 30.03.2015 worth Rs. ...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2015
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Subhash Thakkar s/o Hari Krishan
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate R.D. Sharma
Respondant Advocate Jaideep Kaushik
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SONEPAT. Complaint No.183 of 2014 Instituted on:28.7.2014 Date of order:16.04.2015Subhash Thakkar son of Hari Kishan Thakkar, resident of H.No.787, Sector 14, Sonepat. ...Complainant. VersusHUDA Sector 15, Sonepat through ...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2015
SURESH KUMAR KAKKAR & ANR. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4551 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/01/2012 in Appeal No. 1450/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS.Through its Chief Adminstrator,HARYANA2. Adminstra...
Case Number: 4551
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.