company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 321 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

Haryana

Case Number: 430

|

Date of Filing: 23-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2016

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S NAINTTARA SHARMA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. A.D.N. RAO, MR. A. VEKATESH & MS. VAISHALI RAMESH

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1026 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 22/10/2013 in Appeal No. 722/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NAINTTARA SHARMAW/O SHRI GYANDEO SHARMA, R/O C-101 SWAMI DAYANAND APARTMENTS, SECTOR--6PLOT NO-...

Case Number: 1026

|

Date of Filing: 03-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2016

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Roop Singh Kuhar

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/16/45InComplaint Case No. CC/15/1661. Roop Singh KuharSon of Sh. Hukam Singh, D.O.B. 10-05-1958R/O H.NO. A-4, Medial Enclave, near Randhir Theatre, Karnal............Appellant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban D...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2016

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Amit Sethi S/o Surinder Pal Sethi

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Sh. Ravinder Chaudhary

Respondant Advocate Jatinder Singh

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 95 of 2014 Date of instt. 04.04.2014 Date of decision:31.08.2016Amit Sethi son of Shri Surinder Pal Sethi, resident of House no.203/13Extn. Urban Estate, Karnal. ……..Complainant. Versus...

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 09-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 03-09-2016

Haryana

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 17-08-2016

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Rajesh Rani

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajender Saroha

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/13/77In160/20121. Rajesh RaniWife of Sh. Maman chand R/o Plot no. 736, Sector 13-17 HUDA Panipat............Appellant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Development AuthorityPanchkula through its Chief Administra...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 19-08-2016

Haryana

Case Number: 97

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2016

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S K.K. Gupta

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 08-08-2016

Haryana

Jitender Phor V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1068 of 2014Date of Institution: 21.11.2014Date of Decision : 15.07.20161. Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Chief Administrator, Panchkula.2. Estate officer, Haryana Urban Developmen...

Case Number: 1068

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 10-08-2016

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SANTOSH GUPTA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3088 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/05/2012 in Appeal No. 1260/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SANTOSH GUPTAW/o Shri Kamal Raj Through G.P.A. Shri Raj Kumar, S/o Shri Anshi Ram, R/o House n...

Case Number: 3088

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-07-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.