Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
Haryana Urban Development Authority & Others V/S The Om Shanti Weaker Section Co-Operative Housing Society Limited
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana Society
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S M/S Khanna Textiles
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/16/23InComplaint Case No. CC/14/2681. M/S Khanna Textiles229-A Sector 29, Part-II H.U.D.A. Panipat through its prop. Shri Devender Khanna.PanipatHaryana...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Deve...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2017
Mohinder Singh V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. First Appeal No.837 of 2014 Date of Institution: -09/22.09.2014Date of Decision: 14.12.2016Haryana Urban Development Authority through its Chief Administrator, Sector-6, Panchkula.The Estate Officer, HUDA, Sector-...
Case Number: 837
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Satish Kumar Nagpal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. G.S. Virk
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-01-2017
JASWANT SINGH V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESTH JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. HARISH MEHLA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2399 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 02/03/2015 in Appeal No. 96/2014 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6,PANCHKULAHARY...
Case Number: 2399
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2016
ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S VIKAS KUMAR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2491 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 14/05/2015 in Appeal No. 145/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. VIKAS KUMARS/O SH.MAHENDER SINGH. R/O CHOWK BAGH, JHANARA, JHAJJAR TOW, TEHSIL & DISTRICT : JHA...
Case Number: 2491
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-11-2016
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Inderjit Goyal S/o Shri Dev Raj Goyal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 300
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2016
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Lila Ram Son of Shri Sheo Ram
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 404
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2016
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S S.K.Sarwal Son of late Shri I.D.Sarwal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2016
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Swaran Lata W/o Jitender Parkash
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.C. Jain
Respondant Advocate R.D. Sharma
Case Number: 430
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.