Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate M.S. Saini
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 453
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2489 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 14/05/2015 in Appeal No. 142/2015 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/6808/2015,IA/6809/2015,IA/7270/2016,IA/7271/2016,IA/8132/20161. PANKAJ KUMAR JAKHARS/O R...
Case Number: 2489
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2489 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 14/05/2015 in Appeal No. 142/2015 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/6808/2015,IA/6809/2015,IA/7270/2016,IA/7271/2016,IA/8132/20161. PANKAJ KUMAR JAKHARS/O R...
Case Number: 2490
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate C.J. Wadhwa
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Execution no. 76 of 2016 Date of instt.: 09.11.2016 Date of decision 09.05.2.2017Amit Sethi S/o Sh. Surinder Pal Sethi R/o H.No. 203/13 Extn., U.E., Karnal. …..Complainant/DH Versus1. Estate Officer, HUDA Hiss...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Anil Kumar Diddee
Respondant Advocate V.K.Rajoria OP No.1,Sultan Singh OP No.2
BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NEAR MINI SECTT. YAMUNA NAGAR AT JAGADHRI.Complaint Case No. CC/331/20121. Krishan Kumar Gupta S/o Genda RamR/o 3 568,Sec-17,Huda,Jagadhri,Teh.Jagadhri,Distt.Yamuna nagar2. Smt.Payal Singla W/o Shri Deepak Kumar R/o 569,Sec-17,HU...
Case Number: 331
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate V.K. Kapoor
Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.24 of 2016 Date of instt.: 20.01.2016 Date of decision:1.5.20171. Smt. Bindu Bansal wife of Suresh Bansal2. Shri Suresh Bansal son of Bhagwat Parsad both residents of house no.1196 sector-13 Urban Estate...
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate V.K. Kapoor
Respondant Advocate Anil Majul
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.305 of 2015 Date of instt.: 09.12.2015 Date of decision:01.05.20171. Rajnish Gupta son of Shri Sat Parkash Gupta.2. Smt.Anju Gupta.3. Neeraj Singla4. Ankit SinglaAll resident of House no.31-A Chaman Gar...
Case Number: 305
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate MOhinder Singh Saini
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 147
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. MANISH KR RAMPAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3166 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 18/12/2015 in Appeal No. 725/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSECTOR 6, PANCHKULAHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. J...
Case Number: 3166
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Daya Nand Antil
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 245
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-04-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.