Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 321 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
1. Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kapur Singh S/o Tek Singh
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Vinod Dogra
Respondant Advocate Kawinder Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.171 of 2015 Date of instt.: 31.07.2015 Date of decision 16.10.2017Kapur Singh son of Sh. Tek Singh, resident of House no.479, Sector 14, Urban Estate, Kurukshetra. ……..Complainant. Vs.1.Th...
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2017
Estat Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Dharampal alias Pal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/15/401. Dharampal alias PalSon of Shri Jogi Ram R/O Devi Lal Colony, Sector 11-12 Part-II PanipatPanipatHaryana2. SanjaySon of Jogi Ram Devi Lal Colony, Sector 11-12 Part-II PanipatPanipatHaryana3. RajeshSon o...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat V/S Som Nath
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/1041. Som NathSon of Sh. Jogi Ram Age about 55 years R/O Devi Lal Colony Sector-12, HUDA, PanipatPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Development Authority PanipatSector 13-17, Pani...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2018
Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat V/S Satpal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/1051. SatpalSon of Sh. Ram Rattan Age about 55 years R/o Devi Lal Colony, Sector-12, HUDA, Panipat.PanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Raj Singh Dabas S/o Ram Singh
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate B.M. Sehgal
Respondant Advocate Amarjeet Singh
Case Number: 93
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2017
MANJIT SINGH & 2 ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2756 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 09/12/2016 in Appeal No. 84/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Administrator, C-3, HUDA Complex, Se...
Case Number: 2756
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sh. Rajinder Kumar Mahajan
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amarbir Dhaliwal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CC/650/2017Rajinder Kumar Mahajan & Anr. Vs Haryana Urban Development Authority & Ors. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Amarbir Dhaliwal, Counsel for Complainants....
Case Number: 650
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Raman Narang
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. P.D. Gautam
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/15/781. Raman NarangSon of Shri Ram Lal Narang Age- 38 Years R/O H.No. 1680, New Housing Board Colony PanipatPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Development Authority Through its Esta...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Kailash Kumari W/o Sh. Naresh KUmar
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Suresh Khanna
Respondant Advocate Vineet Rathore
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2017
Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Vinod Jain S/o Narumal Jain
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Saraj Bala
Respondant Advocate Yashbir Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint No.. 66 of 2015Date of instt . 09.04.2015Date of decision 03.07.2017Vinod Jain s/o Sh. Narumal Jain r/o House No.48, Sector-14, U.E. Karnal. ……….Complainant.Versus1. The Chief Administrat...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.