Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 321 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
JAGDEV SINGH & 5 ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 714 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1060/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARY...
Case Number: 714
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sh. Rajinder Kumar Mahajan
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amarbir Dhaliwal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The Accounts Officer of HUDA states that the HUDA has complied with the order and he has placed on record a copy of RE-allotment letter. He further states that the complainant has given a letter that he will not claim Rs.2000/- per day as ordered by this Forum if the house is tra...
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Raj Kumar S/o Girdhari Lal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Bhagat Singh
Respondant Advocate Rajbir Singh
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2018
The Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kapur Singh
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Vinod Dogra
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.420 of 2017 Date of instt. 18.12.2017 Date of decision:4.1.2018Kapur Singh son of Shri Tek Singh, resident of House no.479, Sector-13, Urban Estate, Kurukshetra. …….Complainant. Versus...
Case Number: 420
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2018
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S BABLI
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MURARI LAL & MR. AJIT KUMAR EKKA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2010 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 11/08/2016 in Appeal No. 35/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BABLIW/O. SHRI RAJ KUMAR, R/O. VILLAGE HALUWAS, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-BHIWANIHARYANA...........Pet...
Case Number: 2010
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2017
Ashok Kumar Boora V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sector-6, Panchkula.
Respondant Advocate Tehsil and District Hisar
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No: 114 of 2017 Date of Institution: 21.11.2017 Date of Decision : 22.11.20171. Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Chief Administrator, Sector-6, Panchkula.2. The Administrator, Har...
Case Number: 114
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2017
VIKAS KUMAR V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3314 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 13/03/2015 in Appeal No. 72/2014 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR SECTOR 6, PANCHKULAHAR...
Case Number: 3314
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Savitri Devi
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2018
Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat V/S Chaman Lal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/1061. Chaman LalSon of Sh. Ram Sarup Age about 60 years R/O Devi Lal Colony Sector-12, HUDA, PanipatPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipa...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2018
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HUDA) & ANR. V/S SURINDER PRUTHI & 2 ORS.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1900 OF 20171. SURINDER PRUTHI & 2 ORS.S/O LATE SH. RAM DHAN PRUTHI, R/O FLAT NO. 404, SHIVA APARTMENTS, SECTOR 21-D,FARIDABADHARYANA2. SATINDER KUMAR DUGGALS/O H R DUGGAL, R/O H.NO. 20, SECTOR-16,FARIDABA...
Case Number: 1900
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.