company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

NCDRC

VAISHALI MITTAL & ANR. V/S ESTATE OFFICE, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1044 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 26/08/2015 in Appeal No. 658/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ESTATE OFFICE, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.BAHADURGARH, HARYANA2. THE CHIEF ADMIN...

Case Number: 1044

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 20-04-2018

NCDRC

KRISHNA SHARMA & ANR. V/S ESTATE OFFICE, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1043 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 26/08/2015 in Appeal No. 657/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ESTATE OFFICE, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.BAHADURGARH, HARYANA2. THE CHIEF ADMIN...

Case Number: 1043

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 20-04-2018

NCDRC

SUNITA SHARMA & ANR. V/S ESTATE OFFICE, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1042 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 26/08/2015 in Appeal No. 656/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ESTATE OFFICE, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.BAHADURGARH, HARYANA2. THE CHIEF ADMIN...

Case Number: 1042

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 20-04-2018

NCDRC

ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S N.K. MATHUR

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2974 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 05/10/2015 in Appeal No. 223/2014 of the State Commission Haryana)1. N.K. MATHURH.NR.C-4-H/79 G.FM JANAK PURI,NEW DELHI - 110058...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. EST...

Case Number: 2974

|

Date of Filing: 20-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-04-2018

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Balinder Singh

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Rajiv Sharma

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint No.. 70 of 2018Date of instt. 19.03.2018Date of decision:20.03.2018Balinder Singh son of Sh. Ranbir Singh resident of village Gogripur, Tehsil and District Karnal.…………ComplainantVer...

Case Number: 70

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2018

Haryana

Manjit Singh Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Shri Om Sharma

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 301 of 2015 Date of instt.:07.12.2015 Date of decision:15.03.2018Shriom Sharma son of Satyanarayan Dutt House no.786/22, Street no.2, Om Shanti Nagar, Devigarh Road Katihal, Haryana pin code 136027 mobi...

Case Number: 301

|

Date of Filing: 07-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2018

NCDRC

GAURAV V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 517 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 22/08/2017 in Appeal No. 373/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.GURGAON ESTATE OFFICER, GURUGAMHARYANA2. HARYANA URBAN...

Case Number: 517

|

Date of Filing: 08-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 23-02-2018

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Meena Sahni

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate S.K. Malhotra

Respondant Advocate Bhanu Partap Singh

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.15 of 2017 Date of instt. 12.01.2017 Date of decision: 16.2.2018Smt. Meena Sahni, age 70 years, wife of Shri Anil Kumar Sahni, Advocate, resident of House no.4, Minor Road, Karnal. …….Co...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-02-2018

NCDRC

PUSHKAR DUTT SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NIRVIKAR VERMA

Respondant Advocate MR. GAJENDER SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3118 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 01/06/2017 in Appeal No. 12/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAT HUDA, SECTOR 13, HISAR HARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 3118

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2018

NCDRC

JAGDEV SINGH & 5 ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 714 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1060/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARY...

Case Number: 714

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.