Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Neha Arya
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Hisar
Appelant Advocate Amit Saini
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 523
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Himani
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Hisar
Appelant Advocate Amit Saini
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 524
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2018
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RANJIT SINGH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate AMARDEEP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Complaint Case No.:135 of 2018Date of Institution:02.08.2018Date of Decision:17.10.2018Ranjit Singh aged 78 years (Senior Citizen), S/o Sh.Jyoti Ram, R/o House No.340/4, Village Haripur, Sector-4, Panchkula, Distric...
Case Number: 135
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2018
ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S H.R. VERMA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.K. GHOSH & MS. TINA GARG
Respondant Advocate MR. SHRESTH JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION REVISION PETITION NO. 7 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 16/03/2017 in Appeal No. 07/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. H.R. VERMAS/o. Late Sh. K.C. Verma, R/o. B-228, Yojana Vihar,Delhi - 110 092...........Pe...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Dayanand
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. V.P. Kadyan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2018
PUSHPA DEVI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3950 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 16/05/2017 in Appeal No. 708/2016 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR HUDA, SECTOR-6, HUDA...
Case Number: 3951
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2018
VEENA KUMARI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHRESHTH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3950 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 16/05/2017 in Appeal No. 708/2016 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR HUDA, SECTOR-6, HUDA...
Case Number: 3950
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kusum Lata
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Gupta
Respondant Advocate Gourav Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.251 of 2016 Date of instt. 29.08.2016 Date of decision 16.07.2018Kusum Lata wife of Shri Subhash Chander, resident of outside Jattan Gate, Karnal.…….Complainant. Versus1. Haryana Urban Dev...
Case Number: 251
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Tilak Raj
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Dhonchak
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Vinay Kumar Gumbar
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. V.P. Kadyan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.