Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT. TRIPTA GOYAL
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate LAVISH ARORA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULAConsumer Complaint No:299 of 2017Date of Institution:19.12.2017Date of Decision:26.04.2019Smt. Tripta Goyal, aged 44 years, wife of Sh. Sandeep Goyal, resident of H. No. 394, Sector 9, Panchkula, Tehsil and Distt. Pa...
Case Number: 299
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2019
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DEEP SHIKHA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate LAVISH ARORA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULAConsumer Complaint No:298 of 2017Date of Institution:19.12.2017Date of Decision:26.04.2019Deep Shikha, aged 29 years, D/o Sh. Prem Bansal, R/o House No.9, Sector 9, Panchkula, Tehsil and District Panchkula. &hellip...
Case Number: 298
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2019
DR. LATA SANGWAN V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARVIND SETH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.1205 of 2018Date of Institution:23.10.2018 Date of Decision:05.04.2019Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Estate Officer, Dabra Road, Hisar , Haryana (now HSVP)…..Appellant.Versus...
Case Number: 1205
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2019
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kamal Deep Sehgal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. A.K. Wadhawan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2019
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT. KRISHNA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. TARUN GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. PIYUSH HANS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 320 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 24/09/2008 in Appeal No. 198/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SMT. KRISHNAR/o. Village Majra Gurdas Tehsil And Distt.RewariHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Vers...
Case Number: 320
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 13-03-2019
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Mahesh Kumar Gupta
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Ms. Debjani Sen
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rohtash Singh
Case Number: 166
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2019
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Ishwar Singh Malik
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Balvinder Singh
Respondant Advocate Gaurav Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Execution No. 16 of 2017Date of instt. 20.04.2017Date of decision: 14.02.2019Ishwar Singh Malik son of Shri Daya Chand resident of house no. 328, Sector-7, Urban Estate Karnal.…………Decree Hold...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2019
The Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Mahender Singh s/o Amar Singh
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate D.N. Antil
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Execution Petition No.: 124 of 2017 INSTITUTED ON: 10.08.2017 DATE OF ORDER: 09.01.2019Mahender Singh Antil son of Amar Singh, Resident of H.No. 961, Sector 14, Sonepat.…Complainant/DH.VersusThe Estate Officer...
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2019
LAL CHAND SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 460 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 13/07/2017 in Appeal No. 218/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR SECTOR 12, FARIDABADHARYANA...........
Case Number: 460
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S M.K. Katyal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Jitender Singh
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/18/83( Date of Filing : 10 Apr 2018 )1. M.K. KatyalS/o Late Sh. Lakhmi Chand R/o House No. 3068, New Housing Board Colony, Sector-12, Panipat, Aged about 73 years.Panipat...........Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.