company-name-logo

Haryana Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 320 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S NARESH KUMAR

Haryana   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ZEAL ATTORNEYS

Respondant Advocate MS. NOOPUR SINGHAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 379 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 29/10/2018 in Appeal No. 922/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NARESH KUMARS/O RAM SARAN, R/O VILLAGE KOSLI MOHALLA DALAYAN, TEHSIL-KOSLIDISTRICT : REWARIHARYA...

Case Number: 379

|

Date of Filing: 20-02-2019

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2024

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Manju Singla

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. V.P. Kadyan

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/19/14( Date of Filing : 01 Apr 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/16/81. Manju SinglaWife of Sh. Pardeep Kumar, Resident of H.No. 23, Ward No. 5, Panipat...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Haryan...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2024

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Tilak Raj

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Dhounchak

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/19/22( Date of Filing : 16 Apr 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/16/151. Tilak RajSon of Sh. Ram Bharose R/O H.No. 868, Sector-25, Part-II, HUDA, Panipat............Appellant(s)Versus1. Hary...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2024

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Nirmal Devi

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Dhounchak

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/19/21( Date of Filing : 16 Apr 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/16/141. Nirmal DeviWife of Dr. Rajbir Arya R/O of H.No. 681, Sector 25, Part-II, HUDA, Panipat...........Appellant(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2024

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Anita

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Dhounchak

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/19/23( Date of Filing : 16 Apr 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/16/471. Smt. Anita Wd/o Sh. Pawan Kumar Jangra R/O H.No. 1384, Sector 25, Part-II, HUDA Panipat...........Appellant(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2024

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Jyoti Parkash

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. V.P. Kadyan

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/19/12( Date of Filing : 01 Apr 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/16/1011. Jyoti ParkashSon of Sh. Laxmi Narain Age about 64 years R/o D-30, NFL Townhip, Vijaypur, Guna(M.P.) through its SPA ...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2024

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Daya Nand

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/19/24( Date of Filing : 23 Apr 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/15/3041. Daya NandSon of Sh. Baru Ram R/O H. No. 172/A/26, New Kranti Nagar, Near HSEB Power House, Panipat...........Appella...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2024

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Ved Pal Lamba

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. V.P. Kadyan

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/19/20( Date of Filing : 04 Apr 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/16/581. Ved Pal LambaSon of Sh. Balwant Singh, R/O Lamba Bhawan, Railway Road near G.T.Road, Gannaur, Distt. Sonepat............

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2024

NCDRC

ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DR. PRAKASH CHAND KALRA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ALLIANCE LAW GROUP

Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 106 OF 2022 IN RP/1404/19991. DR. PRAKASH CHAND KALRA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s)BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE DR. INDER JIT S...

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 08-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2024

Chandigarh

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Raj Kumar Malik

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Sanjiv Gupta

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/836/2021Date of Institution:02/12/2021Date of Decision:18/06/2024Raj Kumar Malik S/o Late Sh.Chattar Singh Malik, GPA Holder/Will Holder for Allottees (Sh.Harjeet Singh S/o Sh.Harbans Singh...

Case Number: 836

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-06-2024

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.