Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ranjinder Singh Sidhu Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:13 of 2022Date of Institution:28.01.2022Date of Decision:08.06.2022Rajiv Bhalla aged about 42 years, son of Panna Lal Bhalla, resident of House No. 218, Shivalik Enclave Manimajra, Manimajra, Chandiga...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2022
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ranjinder Singh Sidhu Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:25 of 2022Date of Institution:16.03.2022Date of Decision:08.06.2022Mewa Singh Maur aged about 83 years, son of Amar Singh Maur, permanent resident of 3T, Ganganagar, Rajasthan presently residing at Ho...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2022
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shekhar Verma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2022
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN & ZAHID AHMED
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 835 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 12/03/2018 in Complaint No. 652/2017 of the State Commission Punjab)1. ESTATE OFFICER (H), GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS.PUDA BHAWAN SECTOR 62 PHASE V...
Case Number: 835
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN & ZAHID AHMED
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 865 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 13/12/2018 in Complaint No. 691/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER , PUDA BHAWAN SECTOR 62M...
Case Number: 865
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 21/01/2020 in Complaint No. 160/2019 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA)...........Appellant(s)Versus1. NISHAN SINGH........
Case Number: 891
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 21/01/2020 in Complaint No. 160/2019 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA)...........Appellant(s)Versus1. NISHAN SINGH........
Case Number: 890
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 21/01/2020 in Complaint No. 160/2019 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA)...........Appellant(s)Versus1. NISHAN SINGH........
Case Number: 889
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY SHANKER & MR. SAROJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
...
Case Number: 598
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2022
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ranjinder Singh Sidhu
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 808 OF 2021Rahat Khanna Vs Greater Mohali Area Development Authority & anr. BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Ranjinder Singh S...
Case Number: 808
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2021
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Greater Mohali Area Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Greater Mohali Area Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Greater Mohali Area Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.