Government
Latest Judgments
Total 980 Consumer Court Cases Against Government.
Government Sram Officer., Vimaniyamak V/S Abhukhan Urf BhacukhanNurkhan Baloch
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate V.B.Makawana
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2020
Government Sram Officer., Vima Niyamak V/S Rajgor Poonam Rajyabhai
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate V.B.Makawana
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2020
Government Sram Officer., Vimaniyamak V/S Bafan Latif Sale
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate V.B.Makawana
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2020
PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION V/S V.R. KRISHNAKUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 61 OF 20111. V.R. KRISHNAKUMARNo. 91/67 (n) Tulasingam Street, Perambur,Chennai - 600 011...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATIO...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2011
All India Institute Of Local Self Government V/S Falguni Ben G. Parmar
Court Name: Surat
Appelant Advocate Kaushika R. Mukhi
Respondant Advocate Sanjay Mithaiwala.
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2020
S.S. RAMACHANDRAN V/S CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HEALTH SCHEME
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAT GAUR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2582 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 08/12/2008 in Appeal No. 863/2008 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HEALTH SCHEMERepresented by the Additional Director, E-2C, Rajaji Bhawan,...
Case Number: 2582
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2011
The Secretary, Government Employee Housing Co-operative Society Ltd., Raichur V/S Babu Ashappa S/o. Hanumanthappa Raichur
Co-operative Society Society Government
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. S.K. Purohit
Respondant Advocate Sri. T. Kishan Rao
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1021. Babu Ashappa S/o. Hanumanthappa RaichurAge: 53 years, Occ: Government Servants, in HPS R/o. Statin Bazar, RaichurRaichurKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Secretary, Government Employee Housing Co-operative Society Ltd., RaichurRaichurRa...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The General Secretary Karnataka State Government D Group Employees Central Association (Regd) V/S Sri. Chikke Gowda S/o. Late Kende Gowda aged about 57 Years
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate K.N. Dayalu
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/10/22091. Sri. Chikke Gowda S/o. Late Kende Gowda aged about 57 YearsNo.170, 11th Main Road, Nagendra Block, Han...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M.P. GOVERNMENT THROUGH S.P. V/S MEENA GUPTA
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 298
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
GOVERNMENT GENERAL HOSPITAL & ANR. V/S M. AYYAPILLAI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4324 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 29/05/2006 in Appeal No. 138/2004 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. M. AYYAPILLAI29, M.G. Street, Pudhur AmbatturChennai - 53Tamil Nadu...........Petitioner(s)V...
Case Number: 4324
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2011
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Government in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Government ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Government under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.