company-name-logo

Government

Latest Judgments

Total 984 Consumer Court Cases Against Government.

Gujarat

Government Labour Officer,Vima niyamak V/S Joshi Manilal Valji

Government  

Court Name: Kachchh

Appelant Advocate V.B.Makawana

Respondant Advocate Self

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2020

Andhra Pradesh

1. M/S CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HOUSING ORGANISATION, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY V/S K.S.MURTHY, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, R/O FLAT NO.501,

Government  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S S.T.BASHA & ASSOCIATES, Mr. Nelson Mathew

Respondant Advocate M/s.S.Prabhakar Reddy - R1 and R2

First Appeal No. FA/666/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/06/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/89/2010 of District Rangareddi)1. K.S.MURTHY, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, R/O FLAT NO.501,17, SNEHA ENCLAVE, PLOT NO.196, WEST MAREDPALLI, SECUNDERABAD............Appellant(s)Ve...

Case Number: 666

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

State Government of Haryana V/S Surinder Kumar Mittal

Haryana   Government  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sh. Surinder Kumar Mittal, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 343 of 2012 1. Surinder Kumar MittalH.No. 306, Sector 12, Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. State Government of Haryana through 1. The Chief S...

Case Number: 343

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MADAN MOHAN LAL SOBTI V/S GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & 6 ORS.

Government  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KUMAR RAJESH SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2013 IN RP/4818/20121. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & 6 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. MADAN MOHAN LAL SOBTI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING M...

Case Number: 123

|

Date of Filing: 25-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 15-05-2013

Karnataka

Karnataka State Government 'D' Group Employees Central Assocation V/S Sri K.R.Ragaswamy S/o Sri Kempaiah, Aged About 55 Years, Junior Assistant

Government  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/12/421. Sri K.R.Ragaswamy S/o Sri Kempaiah, Aged About 55 Years, Junior AssistantOffice of Karnataka Gove...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 26-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

The Oriental Insurance Company (A Government of India Undertaking) 6-2-976, "Capitol", Pavani Estate V/S Mr. K. Parthasarathy, S/o. Late Sri K. Srinivasachary, aged 40 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. H.No. 12-11-1441, Boudhanagar, Warasiguda, Hyderabad.

The Oriental Insurance   Oriental Insurance   Government   Oriental Insurance Company  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.M.R.B. Manikandan

Respondant Advocate M/s. K.N.V.Radha Krishna

FA No: 50 Of 2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/10/2011 in Case No. CC/1147/2010 of District Hyderabad-I)1. Mr. K. Parthasarathy, S/o. Late Sri K. Srinivasachary, aged 40 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. H.No. 12-11-1441, Boudhanagar, Warasiguda, Hyderabad............Appellant(s...

Case Number: 50

|

Date of Filing: 16-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA & ORS. V/S SHABANA BEGUM

Government  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SYED AHMED SAUD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 851-852 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/11/2010 in Appeal No. 918-1096/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. SHABANA BEGUMR/o. Mannalli, Taluka ana DistrictBidarKarnataka...........Petitioner(s)...

Case Number: 851

|

Date of Filing: 10-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2013

NCDRC

MADAN MOHAN LAL SOBTI V/S GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & 6 ORS.

Government  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KUMAR RAJESH SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. KARAN DIWAN & MR. S.S. CHOPRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4818 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1270/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & 6 ORS.Through the Secretary, Ministry of Railway, NEW DELHI2. The General...

Case Number: 4818

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 25-02-2013

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Chairman,The Vidarbha Housing Counstruction Works Association V/S Anand Narayanrao Limje,Age-59/Rt Government servant

Government  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V T Bhoskar

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/03/1505(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. Miscellaneous Application No. of District None)1. Anand Naraya...

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2003

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

State Government of Haryana, V/S Surinder Kumar Mittal

Government  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Comp. in person

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 297 of 2012 1. Surinder Kumar Mittal# 306, Sector 12, Panchkula. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. State Government of Haryana,through the Director of E...

Case Number: 297

|

Date of Filing: 12-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Government in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Government ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Government under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.