Government
Latest Judgments
Total 984 Consumer Court Cases Against Government.
Dean/RMO Government Medical College and Hospital,Theni.& Others,Government Medical College and Hos V/S P.Kondayasamy & 4 others,Power Agent Sulthan,F4,Edgha Building,Kalavasal ,Madurai-16.
Medical Medical College Government
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A.Haja Mohideen -App
Respondant Advocate K.G.Balaji-R-1,Anand,Abdul & Vinodh- R2.
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2016
Dr.Gundla Muralidhar S/o. Chinna Peramaiah, Aged 40 Years, Occ: Government Doctor in PhC Thirumalagi V/S Sri Chinthanta Sathaiah S/o. Ramaiah, Aged 45 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Gottiparthy Village, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.P.S.P.Suresh Kumar
Respondant Advocate Mr.V.Gourishankat Rao
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/247/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/02/2013 in Case No. CC/43/2009 of District Nalgonda)1. Sri Chinthanta Sathaiah S/o. Ramaiah, Aged 45 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Gottiparthy Village,...
Case Number: 247
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Dr.Gundla Muralidhar S/o. Chinna Peramaiah, Aged 40 Years, Occ: Government Doctor in PhC Thirumalagi V/S Sri Chinthanta Sathaiah S/o. Ramaiah, Aged 45 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Gottiparthy Village, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.P.S.P.Suresh Kumar
Respondant Advocate Mr.V.Gourishankat Rao
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/247/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/02/2013 in Case No. CC/43/2009 of District Nalgonda)1. Sri Chinthanta Sathaiah S/o. Ramaiah, Aged 45 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Gottiparthy Village,...
Case Number: 247
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. Bajrang Lal Agarwal, S/o. late Brij Mohan Agarwal, Aged about 56 years, Proprietor of M/s. Baajra V/S K. Jagannadha Rao S/o. K. Lakshmi Nrayana, Aged 61 Years, Retired Government Servant, R/o. H.No. 6-3-595/50, Padmavathinagar Colony, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500 004.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. P.V.Mahesh
Respondant Advocate Mr. N. Raghavan ? OP1
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADComplaint Case No. CC/11/20131. K. Jagannadha Rao S/o. K. Lakshmi Nrayana, Aged 61 Years, Retired Government Servant, R/o. H.No. 6-3-595/50, Padmavathinagar Colony, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500 004............C...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. Bajrang Lal Agarwal, S/o. late Brij Mohan Agarwal, Aged about 56 years, Proprietor of M/s. Baajra V/S K. Jagannadha Rao S/o. K. Lakshmi Nrayana, Aged 61 Years, Retired Government Servant, R/o. H.No. 6-3-595/50, Padmavathinagar Colony, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500 004.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. P.V.Mahesh
Respondant Advocate Mr. N. Raghavan ? OP1
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADComplaint Case No. CC/11/20131. K. Jagannadha Rao S/o. K. Lakshmi Nrayana, Aged 61 Years, Retired Government Servant, R/o. H.No. 6-3-595/50, Padmavathinagar Colony, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500 004............C...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Government Labor Officer V/S Khanjibhai Chauhan
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate P K Patodiya
Respondant Advocate R V Kalola
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2020
Government Labor Officer V/S Nanduben Babariya
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate M C Zala
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2020
Government Labor Officer V/S Jenuben Karamata
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate M C Zala
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2020
Government Labor Officer V/S Manjulaben Antala
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate P K Patodiya
Respondant Advocate R V Kalola
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2020
Government Labor Officer V/S Hansaben Chavda
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate P K Patodiya
Respondant Advocate R V Kalola
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Government in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Government ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Government under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.