company-name-logo

Government

Latest Judgments

Total 980 Consumer Court Cases Against Government.

Uttar Pradesh

utter perdesh government & other V/S shrimti lajjavati

Government  

Court Name: Mainpuri

Appelant Advocate dharm mitr

Respondant Advocate servesh kumar mishr

Case Number: 92

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-08-2020

Punjab

Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisation V/S Shri Ram

Government  

Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali

Appelant Advocate J.P. Nahar

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/425/20151. Shri RamH.No.1225, Sector-9, Urban Estate, Karnal (Haryana)............Complainant(s)Versus1. Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisation6 th Floor, A Wing Janpath Bhawan, Janpath, New Delhi-110001, through its Chief ...

Case Number: 425

|

Date of Filing: 25-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 05-07-2016

Jharkhand

Dr. Mahendra Yadav, M.S Government Hospital, Badlapur V/S Sri Baleshwar Pathak

Government  

Court Name: Dhanbad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2020

Gujarat

ASST. GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER V/S DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE

Government  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V P NANAVATY

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 29-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-06-2016

Delhi

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HEALTH SCHEME V/S RAVINDER SINGH PAWAR

Government  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/783/20081. RAVINDER SINGH PAWAR FLAT NO. A-4 SHAKTI APPTS. SECTOR -9 ROHINI DELHI 110085...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CENTRAL GOVERNME...

Case Number: 783

|

Date of Filing: 29-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 20-06-2016

NCDRC

FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. & ORS. V/S GOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ANR.

Society   Government  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. D. BHARATHI REDDY

Respondant Advocate MR. SRIDHAR POTARAJU

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 264 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 19/05/2010 in Complaint No. 62/2003 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. AGRICULTURE INSURANCE CO. OF INDIARegistered office at Amba Deep Building 13th Floor 14.K.G ...

Case Number: 382

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2010

|

Date of Upload: 02-06-2016

Maharashtra

Exucative Officer, Government of Maharashtra V/S Pundlik Sitaram Raut

Government  

Court Name: Nashik

Appelant Advocate Keshav Santu Shelke

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 171

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-06-2016

Rajasthan

Rajasthan Government Through Disst Colloctor V/S Pramod Kumar s/o Kishan Lal

Government   Rajasthan  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Prem Prakash Bunkar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 852

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 01-06-2016

Maharashtra

Union Government Of India Through General Manager Central Railway V/S Avinash Vinayak Prabhune

Railway   Government  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/14/3751. Avinash Vinayak Prabhune113, Pandurang Gawande Layout Ranapratap Nagar NagpurNagpurMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versu...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 13-06-2016

Maharashtra

Union Government Of India V/S Avinash Vinayak Prabhune

Government  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/14/4851. Avinash Vinayak Prabhune113, Pandurang Gawande Layout Ranapratap Nagar 440022 NagpurMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 13-06-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Government in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Government ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Government under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.