Government
Latest Judgments
Total 984 Consumer Court Cases Against Government.
DR. NAVNEET AGGARWAL V/S GOVERNMENT
Court Name: Shamli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes and Redressel ForumShamli, Uttar PradeshMiscellaneous Application No. MA/5/2017( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2017 )InComplaint Case No. CC/11/20141. GOVERNMENTSHAMLI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DR. NAVNEET AGGARWALMEERUT...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HO...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2019
The Director BPS Government Medical Collage For Women V/S Suresh Sharma
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Naveen Ranga
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 331
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2017
1.The Superintendent DSR Government Head Quarters Hospital V/S Dandiga Narsamma
Court Name: Nellore
Appelant Advocate M.D.Rahimkhan
Respondant Advocate K.Raghunatha Reddy
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2017
Government of India through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Nirmal Jit Singh Walia
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Government
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Manish Kumar,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:220 of 2017Date of Institution:07.03.2017Date of Decision:07.12.2017Nirmal Jit Singh Walia s/o Sh.Swaran Singh Walia, R/o Amar Swaran Niwas, #511, Phase-1, SAS Nagar (Mohali) 160055 &hellip...
Case Number: 220
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2018
Uttar Pradesh Government Through District Magistrate & Others V/S Narendranath Rai
Court Name: Ghazipur
Appelant Advocate Shri Om Prakash Gupta, Babita Gupta
Respondant Advocate Shri Atma Yadav
Case Number: 275
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2017
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA V/S SMT- RAJJAN DEVI
Court Name: Hamirpur
Appelant Advocate S.N. GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HAMIRPURUPCOURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/1/20161. SMT- RAJJAN DEVISARILA TOWAN, SUB TOWAN SARILAHAMIRPURUTTAR PRADESH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA HAMIRPURHAMIRPURUTTAR PRADESH............Opp.Party(s) BEF...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2017
Rajendra Narain V/S U.P. Government Through D.M.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R K Gupta
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1492/2016( Date of Filing : 01 Aug 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/12/2015 in Case No. C/141/2006 of District Etawah)1. U.P. Government Throug...
Case Number: 1492
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2018
GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER V/S DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE STATE INSURANCE FUND
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V P NANAVATY
Respondant Advocate OPP 1: V N KHATRI
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2017
RAJ KUMARI V/S CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION (CGEWHO) & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K & K LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3373 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 25/04/2017 in Appeal No. 362/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION (CGEWHO) & ANR.6TH FLOOR, A WING JANPA...
Case Number: 3373
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2017
Department of Local Government Punjab V/S Shashi Bala Mittal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, the complainants wish to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the competent Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three orig...
Case Number: 750
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Government in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Government ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Government under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.