Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 149 OF 2012 IN RP/1327/20111. MRS. NANITA SHARMA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GO AIRLINES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & OTHERS...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING M...
Case Number: 149
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2012
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 191 Of 20111. S K TAPURIAHB/1201/02 ELDORADO KASHINATH DHURU ROAD,PRABHADEVIMUMBAI-400025MAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GO AIRLINES INDIA PVT LTD & OTHERSNEVILLE HOUSE,J N HEREDIA MARG,BALLARD ESTATEMUMBAI-400001MAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: SHR...
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1327 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/01/2011 in Appeal No. 623/2008 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MRS. NANITA SHARMAR/o. 35, NRI Complex, Mandakini, Greater Kailash-IVNew Delhi - 110019Delhi........
Case Number: 1327
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2012
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 211 of 2012 1. Ravi GuptaS/o Sh. Pawan Kumar Gupta, R/o Flat No. 206, Tower 2nd, Exotic Heiht Society, Peer Muchalla, NAC Zirakpur, Distt-S.A.S NAgar, Mohali ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Go Airlines India LTd.Cabin No. ...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 202 of 2012 1. Prem Sagar GuptaS/o Sh. Lachhaman Dass, R/o # 3304, Sector 15-D, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Go Airlines (Insia) LtdC/o Birtannia Industries Ltd., A-33, Lawrence Road Industrial Area, New Delh...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Hitender Kansal, Adv. proxy for Sh. P.M.Goyal, Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Respondent no. 1 in person and on behalf of resp. no. 1 & 3.
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 35 of 2012 1. Go Airlines ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Er. R.P.Bhatti ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Sh. Hitender...
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 749 of 2010 1. Er. R.P.BhattiChief Engineer Punjab Mani Board Chandigarh2. Er. Tarsem Lal Garg Superintending Engineer Punjab Mandi Board #426 SEctor44/A Chandigarh3. Er. Sucha nand Chief Engineer(Retd.)Punjab Mandi Boa...
Case Number: 749
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G SHIRKE
Respondant Advocate NONE
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/644(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/02/2009 in Case No. 505/06 of District Mumbai(Suburban)) 1. M/S GO AIRLINES INDIA PVT LTDCORPORATE OFFICE AT A PAPER BOX HOUSE, OFF MAHAKALI...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Sampath Bapat
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN,Ph:22352624 No:8, 7th floor, Sahakara bhavan, Cunningham road, Bangalore- 560052. consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/1559 Represented by its Laison Ossicer, M/s St George College of Management, Science...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Mrs.K.S.tripathi
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/2741. Dalichand R.Chandan & ors27,Gujar Building, Sadashiv Cross Lane,GirgaonMumbai-400 004Maharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Go Airlines Pvt.Ltd.Neville House, J.N.Heredia Marg, Ballard EstateMumbai-400 001Maharastra............Opp.Party(s) BEFO...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Go Airlines in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Go Airlines ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Go Airlines under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.