company-name-logo

Ghaziabad Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 306 Consumer Court Cases Against Ghaziabad Development Authority.

NCDRC

ACHHAR SINGH DOGRA V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. S.B. LAL SAXENA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1553 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/11/2010 in Appeal No. 2147/1997 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVice Chairman Vikas Path, Hapur RoadGhaziabadUP.............

Case Number: 1553

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2012

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SANJAY NAGAR RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate

Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 139 OF 19971. SANJAY NAGAR RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATIONP- BLOCK ,SANJAY NAGAR GHAZIABAD U.P............Complainant(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHE VICE CHAIRMAN GHAZIABAD U.P............O...

Case Number: 139

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-1997

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2012

NCDRC

VICE CHAIRMAN GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RADHA VERMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1474 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1588/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RADHA VERMA16 Sri Anandpuram DharampurBalrampur - 271201...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 1474

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2012

NCDRC

ASHOK KUMAR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND GARG

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3935 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/07/2011 in Appeal No. 2091/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice President, ghazibad Development Authorit...

Case Number: 3935

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2012

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MALA SHARMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3443 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/03/2008 in Appeal No. 2001/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MALA SHARMAR/o 6547/9,Gali No.2 Dev NagarNew DelhiDelhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...

Case Number: 3443

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 26-03-2012

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PRAKASH WADHWANI

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. WADHWANI & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 265 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 01/04/2001 in Appeal No. 03/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PRAKASH WADHWANIA 201 SECTOR 7 PLOT NO.12A HAPPY HOME APARTMENTS DWARKA NEW DELHI 1100037....

Case Number: 265

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2006

|

Date of Upload: 09-11-2011

NCDRC

S.B. SINGH V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3932 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 22/02/2010 in Appeal No. 1753/1996 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary, Vikash Path, Distt. City Ghaziabad...

Case Number: 3932

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 15-09-2011

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S GAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV SRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 74 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 25/08/2010 in Appeal No. 1802/1996 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMAKM-1, New Kavi NagarGhaziabadHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 06-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2011

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT. ASHA & ANR

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate N. SAHOO

Respondant Advocate NA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 412 OF 2004(Against the Order dated 24/08/2004 in Complaint No. 82/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SMT. ASHA & ANRB-82, NANAK PURA NEW DELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTH...

Case Number: 412

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2004

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2011

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHAKUNTALA DEVI

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH, ADV.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 680 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 06/12/2006 in Appeal No. 1488/1997 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SHAKUNTALA DEVIW/O. SH. HARI CHAND, HOUSE NO.300, VIDYA NIKETAN ROAD, MODEL TOWN ROHTAK ...

Case Number: 680

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 19-05-2011

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ghaziabad Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ghaziabad Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Ghaziabad Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.