company-name-logo

Ghaziabad Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 306 Consumer Court Cases Against Ghaziabad Development Authority.

NCDRC

RAMJI KOHLI & ANR. V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV

Respondant Advocate SUMAN KAPOOR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...

Case Number: 3638

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2013

NCDRC

RAJBALA MITTAL V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...

Case Number: 3639

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2013

NCDRC

SUDERSHAN KAPOOR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV

Respondant Advocate SUMAN KAPOOR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...

Case Number: 3640

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2013

NCDRC

SHAKUMBARI DEVI V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV

Respondant Advocate SUMAN KAPOOR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...

Case Number: 3641

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2013

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HATAM SINGH

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND NANDAN

Respondant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 27/03/2006 in Appeal No. 3343/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. HATAM SINGHDHRAM PAL SINGH VILL- MORTA JALALABAD DISTRICT - GHAZIABAD U,P ...........P...

Case Number: 2200

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2006

|

Date of Upload: 05-12-2013

NCDRC

MAMTA SINGH V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. YATISH MOHAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/01/2012 in Complaint No. 25/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/2773/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Present, Ghaziabad Develop...

Case Number: 168

|

Date of Filing: 27-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2013

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHYAM NARAYAN SINGH

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3631 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/08/2011 in Appeal No. 132/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SHYAM NARAYAN SINGH515, DDA, MIG, Baghbaan Apartment, Pocket GH-2, Rohini, Sector-28New D...

Case Number: 3631

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2013

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BRIJ LAL SINGH

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M.R. ANAND

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 212 OF 2013 IN RP/4136/20111. BRIJ LAL SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBE...

Case Number: 212

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-05-2013

NCDRC

VICE CHAIRMAN, GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RADHA VERMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2674 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1588/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RADHA VERMA16 Sri Anandpurdhan DharampurBalrampur - 271201U.P...........Petitioner(s)Ver...

Case Number: 2674

|

Date of Filing: 19-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-10-2012

NCDRC

DABAR INDIA LTD. V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3098 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 02/12/2008 in Appeal No. 2694/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman Vikaspath Ghaziabad ..............

Case Number: 3098

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ghaziabad Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ghaziabad Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Ghaziabad Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.