company-name-logo

Ghaziabad Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 310 Consumer Court Cases Against Ghaziabad Development Authority.

NCDRC

HARISHANKAR MAHAUR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHANTANU KRISHNA

Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3212 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 31/05/2012 in Appeal No. 360/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice ChairmanGhazaiabadU.P...........Petitione...

Case Number: 3212

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 12-11-2014

NCDRC

HARI KRISHNA JOHRI V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate M/S. MANOJ SWARUP & CO.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4706 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/05/2010 in Appeal No. 2392/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough-Vice Chairman...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HAR...

Case Number: 4706

|

Date of Filing: 28-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2014

NCDRC

HARISHANKAR MAHAUR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHANTANU KRISHNA

Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 339 OF 2014 IN RP/3212/20121. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARISHANKAR MAHAUR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDI...

Case Number: 339

|

Date of Filing: 06-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2014

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HATAM SINGH

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND NANDAN

Respondant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 27/03/2006 in Appeal No. 3343/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. HATAM SINGHDHRAM PAL SINGH VILL- MORTA JALALABAD DISTRICT - GHAZIABAD U,P ...........P...

Case Number: 2200

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2006

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2014

NCDRC

HARISHANKAR MAHAUR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHANTANU KRISHNA

Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3212 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 31/05/2012 in Appeal No. 360/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice ChairmanGhazaiabadU.P...........Petitione...

Case Number: 3212

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-08-2014

NCDRC

UMESH CHAND JAIN V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3587 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/07/2013 in Appeal No. 340/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH VICE-CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH, DISTRICT : GHAZIABADU.P...

Case Number: 3587

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 31-07-2014

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS. V/S ALOK GARG

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2320 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 28/02/2013 in Appeal No. 806/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. ALOK GARGS/O SHRI SHIV KUMAR GARG, R/O C-22 SECTOR-39NOIDA - 201303U.P...........Petition...

Case Number: 2320

|

Date of Filing: 10-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 23-07-2014

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HATAM SINGH

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND NANDAN

Respondant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2013 IN RP/2200/20061. HATAM SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHO...

Case Number: 818

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 09-06-2014

NCDRC

VICE CHAIRMAN GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RADHA VERMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate M/S. R.S.A. & CO.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3667 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/08/2013 in Appeal No. 1588/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RADHA VERMAW/O LATE SRI RAJIV VERMA, 16-SRI ANANDPUR DHAM DHARAMPUR, VISHNUPUR, BALRAMPU...

Case Number: 3667

|

Date of Filing: 15-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2014

NCDRC

SANJEEV NARAIN SAXENA V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV

Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2013 IN RP/3636/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SANJEEV NARAIN SAXENA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE, PRESIDING M...

Case Number: 367

|

Date of Filing: 17-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 23-12-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ghaziabad Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ghaziabad Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Ghaziabad Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.