Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HARJOT SINGH BEDI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3379 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 08/09/2010 in Appeal No. 255/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. BHAGAT FORDThrough its Aughorized Representative A.B. Motors Pvt. Ltd., 19, Industrial Area,...
Case Number: 3379
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2010
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate D.A.Belanke
Respondant Advocate S.S.Khot
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/08/591 1. Appasaheb B.Shambhushete Nanadani Tal.Shirol Dist. Kolhapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. M/s Chougule Tractors New Holland Ford Tractors and OthersDattanagar Shirol Tal, Shirol Dist. Kolhapur2. New...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate IP
Respondant Advocate DUA Associates for op1
IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. CC/1995/2009 Dr.T.V.Gopalakrishnan ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Ford India Pvt., Ltd., Lathangi Ford, ...........Responden...
Case Number: 1995
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANISH MOHAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1442 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 15/12/2009 in Appeal No. 2221/2006 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) 1. FORD TRACTOR AGENCYOpposite Agrawal Tractor, Agricultural Engineering, Panna Naka, Tehs...
Case Number: 1442
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2010
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT. NEELA BOSE. Mr. Ashoke Chatterjee.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Koyeli Mukhopadhyay.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION WEST BENGAL BHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027Execution Application No. SC/09/EX/2007 1. M/S. NEW SENCO JEWELLERY HOUSE195/1, RASH BEHARI AVENUE, P.S. GARIAHAT, KOLKATA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S. ...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate SKU
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2019
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPLOT NO. 5-B, SECTOR 19-B, MADHYA MARG, CHANDIGARH-160019 Phone No. 0172-2700179CONSUMER CASE NO. 1171 of 2008 1. Pawan Kum,ar Kukrejason of Sh.A.D.Kukreja r/o 215, Advocate Society, Sec. 49-A, Chandigarh ...........Respondent(...
Case Number: 1171
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KOCHAR & CO.
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 19 Apr 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/864/2005(Against the Order dated 21/03/2005 in Appeal No. 1002-1112/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. FORD INDIA PVT LTDnullnullnull ...........Appellant(s)Vs...
Case Number: 864
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2005
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2009
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Brahma Ganesh
Respondant Advocate
DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMDIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,DC Office Compound, Sath Kachericonsumer case(CC) No. CC/08/74 Smt.Haseena Begum W/o Abdul Waheed ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Shiva Ford Motors New Holland Ford Tractors India Pvt Ltd ...........Responde...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Palakkad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM Civil Station, Palakkad, Kerala Pin:678001 Tel : 0491-2505782 consumer case(CC) No. 84/2006 C.Silvester ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Ford Credit Kotak Mahindra Ltd.,Ford Credit Kotak Mahindra Ltd. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt.Bhanumathi.A....
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ford in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ford ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ford under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.