Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Souvik Das. Mr. Gouranga Gupta Roy.
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Chatterjee. Mr. Aloke Mukhopadhyay.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION WEST BENGAL BHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027Execution Application No. SC/17/EX/2006 1. SRI KISHOR PRANJIWANDAS POPATS/O. LATE PRASJIWANDAS BHAGWANDAS POPAT, GARDENIA HOMES, FLAT- 8B, 227/1A, A. J. C. BOSE...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.N. PURI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 366-368 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 06/09/2010 in Appeal No. 1859-3189/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ASHISH TAYALR/o. 108, Industrial Area, Ambala CityAmbalaHaryaan...........Petitioner(s...
Case Number: 366
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH K. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4602 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 24/09/2010 in Appeal No. 283/2010 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. TUSHAR SHARMAThrough Shri Prateek Sharma, R/o. 43, Geetanjali Vihar, Ameri Road, Nehru Nag...
Case Number: 4602
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. P.K.Kukreja, Appellant in person
Respondant Advocate Sh.Anupam Bansal, Adv. for OP 1, Sh.Vikas Jain, Adv. for OP 2, Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Adv. proxy for Sh.Rajneesh Malhotra, Adv. for OP 3
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 163 of 2010 1. Pawan Kumar Kukrejas/o Lt. Sh. AD Kukreja aged about 45 years, resident of H.No. 215, Advocate Society, Sector 49A...
Case Number: 163
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.H.S.Bedi, Adv. for appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.K.S.Arya, Adv. for OP No.1, Sh.Sandeep Suri, Adv. for Op No. 2 & 3
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 255 of 2010 1. Bhagat FordA.B. Motors Pvt. Ltd., 19, Industrial Area, Mohali, through its Authorised Representative ...........Ap...
Case Number: 255
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate KOCHHAR AND CO.
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 415 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 28/10/2005 in Complaint No. 252/2001 of the State Commission Delhi)1. FORD INDIA PRIVATE LTD.S P KOIL POST CHENGALPAT - 603204 CHENNAI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. CHAITANYA ...
Case Number: 415
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KOCHHAR AND CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SANJOY KUMAR GHOSH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 545 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 18/05/2006 in Complaint No. 123/2000 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. FORD INDIA PRIVATE LTD.S P KOIL POST CHENGALPATTU - 603 204 TAMIL NADU...........Appellant(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 545
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2010
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 339 of 2010 1. Mr. Ashish DuaS/o Sh. Harbhajan Singh Dua R/o House No. 41-A Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Ford India(P) Ltd. and Other...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Brahamaganesh
Respondant Advocate
Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sath Kacheri, Raichur.Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sath Kacheri, Raichur.Execution Application(EA) No. EA/09/22 Smt.Haseena Begum W/o Abdul Waheed ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Shiva Ford Motors, R/o. Santebazar Maski, Tq. Lingasgu...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ford in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ford ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ford under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.