Ford
Latest Judgments
Total 690 Consumer Court Cases Against Ford.
THANKAMMA DEVASIA V/S FORD INDIA LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUJAMADHAV
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMREVISION PETITION.27/16ORDER DATED:23.05.2016 PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERFord India Pvt. Ltd.,Block 1B, 1st floor,RMZ Millenia Business Park 143, : P...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2016
Gurdarshan Singh Dhillon V/S M/s Bhagat Ford
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harjot Singh Bedi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:83 of 2016Date of Institution:18.03.2016Date of Decision:16.05.2016M/s Bhagat Ford, 53, Industrial Area, Phase-II, Chandigarh.……Appellant/Opposite PartyV e r s u sGurdarshan Singh Dhillon, House...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Ford India Pvt.Ltd. V/S Randhir Singh S/o Balwant Singh
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate D.C.Sharma
Respondant Advocate P.K.Kashyap Op No.1,Vikas Aggarwal Op No.2&3
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 446 of 2011. Date of institution: 06.05.2011 Date of decision: 16.05.2016Randhir Singh aged about 35 years son of Sh. Balwant Singh, resident of Village Bakarpur, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna ...
Case Number: 446
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2016
M/S Khushi Ford V/S Gurumukh Singh
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Tejbir Kharb
Respondant Advocate Sh. Mahabir Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/14/3311. Gurumukh SinghSon of Shri Virsa Singh R/o VPO Sondapur Distt. PanipatPanipatHARYANA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Khushi FordSector 8, near Toll Plaza G.T.Road Panipat(Haryana) through its Mana...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2016
THE FORD INDIA PVT LTD. V/S GURMAIL SINGH
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate SUMIT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate JAGDISH KASYAP
CC No.288 of 2013 Gurmail Singh Vs. The Ford India & others.Present: None for complainant. None for Op No.1. Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. counsel for OP No.2. Sh. Nikhilesh Bh...
Case Number: 288
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2016
MANAGING DIRECTOR, FORD INDIA PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S MALAY KR. DEB
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. CHARU AMBWANI
Respondant Advocate M/S KOCHHAR & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 225 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 23/06/2015 in Appeal No. 32/2014 of the State Commission Tripura)1. MALAY KR. DEBONE OF THE DIRECTOR OF M/S CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY PVT.LTD. ARPITA BHAVAN, JAI...
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2016
Bhagat Ford (AB Motors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ms.Punam Mehta
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Anmol Mehta, Adv
Respondant Advocate H.S.Bedi,Adv Manjit Singh,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:315 of 2015Date of Institution:16.6.2015Date of Decision:29.4.2016Ms. Punam Mehta w/o Sh. Subhash Mehta House No.1079, Sector 19B, Chandigarh …..ComplainantVersus1. Bhagat Ford (AB Mo...
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-06-2016
Sh. Lal Chand Thakur. & Anr. V/S Ford India Pvt. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Prince Chauhan.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2016
standerd ford academy pvt ltd V/S mahendra sharma
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2017
Jogindar Singh President of Ford India & Ors. V/S Smt. Kumud Shrivastava
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Miss Rekha Roy
Respondant Advocate Shri R.K.Bhawnani
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ford in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ford ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ford under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.