company-name-logo

Ford

Latest Judgments

Total 690 Consumer Court Cases Against Ford.

Rajasthan

Pradeep Poddar s/o Jagdish Poddar V/S Ford India Pvt. Ltd. through its Manager S P Koli

Ford India   Ford   Poddar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Saneep Phatak

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 593

|

Date of Filing: 25-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2016

Punjab

Bhagat Ford V/S Santokh Singh

Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate R.K.Arya

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 276

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-11-2016

Chandigarh

Bhagat Ford Motors V/S Mrs. Mamta Minocha

Ford  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Dated :09/11/2016ORDER Sh. Nitin Manocha, Authorized Agent for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complai...

Case Number: 950

|

Date of Filing: 07-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2016

West Bengal

Kaiken Ford Service Centre and 2 others V/S Ardhendu Sekhar Mondal

Ford  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/14/5451. Ardhendu Sekhar MondalVill. Roy Nagar, North of Rain Gate, P.O. & P.S. Diamond Harbour, Pin-743331............Compla...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-11-2016

Chandigarh

Bhagat Ford Motors V/S Mrs. Mamta Minocha

Ford  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Dated :04/11/2016ORDER Authority letter on behalf of the complainant has been filed. Sh. Nitin Minocha, Authorized Agent for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed...

Case Number: 938

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2016

Chandigarh

M/s Bhagat Ford V/S Gurdarshan Singh Dhillon

Ford  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Dated :27/10/2016ORDER Sh. Gurdarshan Singh Dhillon, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the execution application that he withdraws this execution application with liberty to file afresh after the decision of the appeal. In view of the aforesaid statement, this...

Case Number: 113

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2016

Jharkhand

M/s Ford India Pvt. Ltd V/S Matadin Agarwalla

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 110

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-10-2019

Telangana

Ford India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Sharanappa Shanthpure

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: Hyderabad-II

Appelant Advocate Party in Person

Respondant Advocate M/s. V.V.S.N. Raju

Case Number: 473

|

Date of Filing: 07-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-10-2016

Maharashtra

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR FORD (I) PVT LTD V/S SMT VIDULA RAJESH MUSALE

Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate GANEDRA V GOKHALE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 30-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-11-2016

Chandigarh

M/s Bhagat Ford V/S Gurdarshan Singh Dhillon

Ford  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sh. H.S.Bedi Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated :18/10/2016ORDER Be registered. An application for deposit of the amount in compliance of the order dated 19.09.2016 passed by the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, in R.P. No.2365/2016, has been filed on behalf of OP/applicant. Heard...

Case Number: 66

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ford in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ford ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Ford under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.