company-name-logo

Ford

Latest Judgments

Total 692 Consumer Court Cases Against Ford.

Rajasthan

O.S. FORD AND OTHER V/S OM PRAKASH

Ford  

Court Name: Barmer

Appelant Advocate UGARA RAM SARAN

Respondant Advocate MANOJ PAREEK

Case Number: 190

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 02-06-2017

Tamil Nadu

The General Manager,Akshaya Ford and Two others V/S A.K.K.Rajini, Dist.Judge

Ford  

Court Name: Madurai

Appelant Advocate V.Vanangamudi

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 214

|

Date of Filing: 05-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-06-2017

Andhra Pradesh

M/s. Ford India Pvt Ltd., Rep. Its CMD V/S Dr. Sunkara Venkateswara Rao

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry

Appelant Advocate E. M. S. Babu

Respondant Advocate -

Case Number: 50

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 21-06-2017

Karnataka

Managing Director, Ford India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Ms. A.V. Madhavi,

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/1863/20151. Ms. A.V. Madhavi,No.906, Brigade Paramount, Old Madras Road, C.V. Raman Nagar, Bangalore 560 093............Complainant(s)Versus1. Managing Director, Ford India Pvt. Ltd.,S.P. Koil Post, Cehngalpattu 603 2014.2. Manager, Elite For...

Case Number: 1863

|

Date of Filing: 13-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2017

Punjab

Bhagat Ford V/S Mohd.Salim

Ford  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Shri Naveen Markan

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/676/20161. Mohd.SalimMohd.Salim aged 49 years S/o Mohd Din R/o 262, Ward No. 22, Sirhandi gate, Malerkotla Distt. SAngrur...........Complainant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 676

|

Date of Filing: 24-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-04-2017

Delhi

D.P. ADHIKURI V/S HARPREET FORD (P) LTD.

Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 12.04.2017First Appeal No. 538/2013(Arising out of the order dated 04/03/2013 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi in ...

Case Number: 538

|

Date of Filing: 07-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 04-05-2017

Haryana

M/s. Ford India Private Limited V/S Chhavi Singhal

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: Faridabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 35

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2017

Haryana

SACHIN TOMAR V/S FORD INDIA LTD.

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate KARAN NEHRA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No. 32 of 2017Date of Institution: 28.03.2017Date of Decision: 05.04.2017Ford India Private Limited, Maraimalai Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, through its President and Managing Director/Director.&he...

Case Number: 32

|

Date of Filing: 28-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 10-04-2017

Chandigarh

Mrs. Mamta Minocha V/S Ford India Private Limited

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Karan Nehra, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHRevision Petition No.:4 of 2017Date of Institution:03.03.2017Date of Decision:20.03.2017Ford India Private Limited through its Manager/ Nominee. Authorized Representative having office at 2nd Floor Building 10 C DLF Cit...

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2017

Punjab

Yogesh Jain V/S Ford India Pvt. Ltd.

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Karan Nehra

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ford in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ford ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Ford under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.