company-name-logo

Ford India

Latest Judgments

Total 343 Consumer Court Cases Against Ford India.

Assam

The CEO, Ford India Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sri Paminder Singh Seihra

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: Sonitpur

Appelant Advocate Mr Ananta Goswami

Respondant Advocate Sri Bhaskar Pratim Saikia

Case Number: 29

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 19-03-2018

NCDRC

LALIT KUMAR & ANR. V/S FORD INDIA PVT. LTD.

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KOCHHAR & CO.

Respondant Advocate SABYASACHI MISHRA & KAMAL CHAMARIA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 135 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 19/10/2015 in Complaint No. 14/2015 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. FORD INDIA PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS OFFICE AT S.P. KOIL POST, CHENGALPATTU-603204...........Appellant(...

Case Number: 135

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 08-06-2016

Kerala

THANKAMMA DEVASIA V/S FORD INDIA LTD

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SUJAMADHAV

Respondant Advocate

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMREVISION PETITION.27/16ORDER DATED:23.05.2016 PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERFord India Pvt. Ltd.,Block 1B, 1st floor,RMZ Millenia Business Park 143, : P...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-06-2016

Haryana

Ford India Pvt.Ltd. V/S Randhir Singh S/o Balwant Singh

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate D.C.Sharma

Respondant Advocate P.K.Kashyap Op No.1,Vikas Aggarwal Op No.2&3

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 446 of 2011. Date of institution: 06.05.2011 Date of decision: 16.05.2016Randhir Singh aged about 35 years son of Sh. Balwant Singh, resident of Village Bakarpur, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna ...

Case Number: 446

|

Date of Filing: 06-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 01-06-2016

Haryana

THE FORD INDIA PVT LTD. V/S GURMAIL SINGH

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: Ambala

Appelant Advocate SUMIT SHARMA

Respondant Advocate JAGDISH KASYAP

CC No.288 of 2013 Gurmail Singh Vs. The Ford India & others.Present: None for complainant. None for Op No.1. Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. counsel for OP No.2. Sh. Nikhilesh Bh...

Case Number: 288

|

Date of Filing: 07-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 12-05-2016

NCDRC

MANAGING DIRECTOR, FORD INDIA PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S MALAY KR. DEB

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. CHARU AMBWANI

Respondant Advocate M/S KOCHHAR & CO.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 225 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 23/06/2015 in Appeal No. 32/2014 of the State Commission Tripura)1. MALAY KR. DEBONE OF THE DIRECTOR OF M/S CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY PVT.LTD. ARPITA BHAVAN, JAI...

Case Number: 225

|

Date of Filing: 19-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2016

Himachal Pradesh

Sh. Lal Chand Thakur. & Anr. V/S Ford India Pvt. Ltd.

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Prince Chauhan.

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 21-04-2016

Chhattisgarh

Jogindar Singh President of Ford India & Ors. V/S Smt. Kumud Shrivastava

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Miss Rekha Roy

Respondant Advocate Shri R.K.Bhawnani

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 01-04-2016

Kerala

ABDUL RASHEED.P.P.K V/S FORD INDIA PVT LTD

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MENON AND PAI

Respondant Advocate

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION SISUVIHARLANE VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO.120/13JUDGMENT DATED:28/03/2016(Appeal filed against the order in CC.No.76/10 on the file of CDRF, Kannur, order dated : 30.11.2012)PRESENTSHRI.K.CHANDRADAS NADAR : JUDICIAL...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2016

Maharashtra

Ford India Pvt Ltd Through its Managing Director V/S Pramod Purshottamdas Mehta

Ford India   Ford  

Court Name: Aurangabad

Appelant Advocate Adv S T Agrawal

Respondant Advocate Adv

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 16-04-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ford India in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ford India ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Ford India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.