company-name-logo

Food

Latest Judgments

Total 1034 Consumer Court Cases Against Food.

Chandigarh

General Manager (Punjab) Food Corporation of India V/S Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Food Corporation Of India   Food   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ms. Geeta Sharma, Adv. for the appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh. Santokh Singh, Adv. for resp. no. 1, 2. Sh. Manmohan Singh, resp. no. 3 in person.

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 113 of 2012 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerNear GPO, Sector 17, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. General Manager (...

Case Number: 113

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

GURDEEP SINGH V/S PUNJAB AGRI FOOD PARKS LTD. & ANR.

Food  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DINESH GUPTA & MR. ANKUR GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1457 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/02/2012 in Appeal No. 912/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB AGRI FOOD PARKS LTD. & ANR.SCo No- 12,2nd floor,Sector-26,Madhya Marg, Through its Managi...

Case Number: 1457

|

Date of Filing: 10-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2012

Chandigarh

Sh. Satya Pal Mohal, V/S Zonal Manager (North) Food Corporation of India

Food Corporation Of India   Food  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Sh. Vinod Kumar Kanwar, Adv.

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 66 of 2012 1. Zonal Manager (North) Food Corporation of IndiaPlot No. A2A, A-2B, Sector 24, Noida (UP) ...........Re...

Case Number: 66

|

Date of Filing: 30-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

MANAER AJMERA BRADARS FOOD PROJECT V/S MAHBUB AHMAD S/O MAKBUL HASAN

Food  

Court Name: Satna

Appelant Advocate Vinod Sharma

Respondant Advocate NA

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2016

Maharashtra

AVON CATTLE FOOD V/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD

The New India Assurance   New India Assurance   Food  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dinesh B GUPTA

Respondant Advocate Baliram Kambli

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/477(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/01/2010 in Case No. 455/06 of District DCF, South Mumbai)1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDCHARISHMA CENTRE 19 TH ROAD CHEMBUR MUMBAI 71Mumbai...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 30-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Food Corporation of India V/S Amarjit Singh

Food Corporation Of India   Food  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 628 of 2011 1. Amarjit SinghEx.A-G-1(D), R/o Tewar Ratewar, Tehsil Kharar, Distt-Mohali (Pb.) ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Food Corporation of India through its Zonal Manager (North) Food Corporation of India, Plot No. ...

Case Number: 628

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MIRIK HEALTH FOOD V/S SARIK MEMON

Food  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR BHAWNANI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 229 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/11/2011 in Appeal No. 475/2010 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. SARIK MEMONMenon Agency, Ramn Mandir, FafadihRaipurC.G...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MIRI...

Case Number: 229

|

Date of Filing: 19-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 23-03-2012

NCDRC

MR. S. J. PATEL V/S THE MANAGING DIRECTOR. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA

Food Corporation Of India   Food  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. K. A. DEWAN & DEEPAK DEWAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2512 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 17/03/2008 in Appeal No. 1051/2004 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAHead Office, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane,New DelhiD...

Case Number: 2512

|

Date of Filing: 10-06-2008

|

Date of Upload: 29-06-2012

Madhya Pradesh

SANJAY DUEBY V/S SURYA FOOD AND AGRO LTD.

Food  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 01-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2015

Chandigarh

Food Corporation of India V/S Kesar Singh

Food Corporation Of India   Food  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Rahul Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 484 of 2011 1. Kesar SinghR/o 3 132, Phase I, Ravindra Enclave,Baltana, Zirakpur. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Food Corporation of Indiathrough its Chairman, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi.2. Food Corporation of Indi...

Case Number: 484

|

Date of Filing: 24-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Food in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Food ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Food under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.