Food
Latest Judgments
Total 1031 Consumer Court Cases Against Food.
The Managing Directors, Greenage Food Products Ltd. V/S Gourhari Manna
Court Name: Purba Midnapur
Appelant Advocate Himanshu Sekhar Samanta
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPURBA MEDINIPURABASBARI, P.O. TAMLUK, DIST. PURBA MEDINIPUR,PIN. 721636TELEFAX. 03228270317Execution Application No. EA/79/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/121/20161. Gourhari MannaS/o Sri Gobinda Manna, Vill.- Ramchandrapur, P.O.- Burarihat, ...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2017
The Managing Directors, Greenage Food Products Ltd. V/S Anima Bera
Court Name: Purba Midnapur
Appelant Advocate Himanshu Sekhar Samanta
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPURBA MEDINIPURABASBARI, P.O. TAMLUK, DIST. PURBA MEDINIPUR,PIN. 721636TELEFAX. 03228270317Execution Application No. EA/8/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/69/20161. Anima BeraW/o Sri Asit Bera, Vill.- Bansda, P.O.-Barnan, P.S.- Kolaghat, Purba...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2017
Pashtun Resturant (Cee Jay Food Enterprises) V/S Vivek Jain
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant wants to withdraw the complaint with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. In this regard he has appended a note on the complaint itself. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be a...
Case Number: 619
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2017
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Maisars Tata Motors Ltd. V/S Maisars Naveen Food Pd.
Court Name: Jaipur-IV
Appelant Advocate Devendra Vyas
Respondant Advocate Ajay Tantia
Case Number: 1393
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2017
The Director, Greenage Food Products Ltd. V/S Rita Bera
Court Name: Purba Midnapur
Appelant Advocate Himanshu Sekhar Samanta
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPURBA MEDINIPURABASBARI, P.O. TAMLUK, DIST. PURBA MEDINIPUR,PIN. 721636TELEFAX. 03228270317Execution Application No. EA/68/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/218/20161. Rita BeraW/o sasadhar Bera, Vill.- Chatra, P.O.- Ramtarakhat, P.s.- TamlukPu...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2017
MANJILAS FOOD TECH PVT LTD V/S PADMANABHAN NAIR P
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/235/20161. PADMANABHAN NAIR PTHAZHEPARAMBIL HO, CHERUKULATHUR PO, CALICUT 673008...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MANJILAS FOOD TECH PVT LTDKOTTEKAD, KUTTUR PO, THRISSUR 6800132. E. K. S STOREKOVOOR, NEA...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2017
M/s Milk Food Limited V/S Yogesh Kapoor
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Vivek Mohan Sharma Adv. & Anil Gogna Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:63 of 2016Date of Institution:27.01.2016Date of Decision:31.07.2017Yogesh Kapoor son of Sh.P.R.Kapoor, resident of House No.3241, Sector 44-D, UT, Chandigarh …..ComplainantVersus1] M...
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2017
MANAGER FOOD DESIRE INDIA V/S SHARF IKBAL
Court Name: Mahoba
Appelant Advocate G.L.PANDEY
Respondant Advocate NONE
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2017
GENERAL MANAGER, (A.P.) FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & 2 ORS. V/S RAMISETTY RAVINDRANATH
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUYODHAN BYRAPANENI & MS. TATINI BASU
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3363 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 28/07/2016 in Appeal No. 297/2015 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. RAMISETTY RAVINDRANATHS/O. VENKAIAH R/O. H.NO. 26-1-498, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, N.G.O. COL...
Case Number: 3363
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Food in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Food ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Food under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.