Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.K.Gupta ,mrs UMA Gupta, and vaibhav Gupta
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No.326 of 2018 Date of Institution : 31.05.2018 Order Reserved on :06.08.2018 Date of Decisio...
Case Number: 326
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-08-2018
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUMEET GOEL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No : 628 of 2017Date of Institution: 22.05.2017 Date of Decision: 20.03.20181. Managing Director, Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Bara Khamba Lane, New Delhi.2. Executive Director, Food Corporation of ...
Case Number: 628
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2018
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUMEET GOEL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No : 627 of 2017Date of Institution: 22.05.2017 Date of Decision: 20.03.20181. Managing Director, Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Bara Khamba Lane, New Delhi.2. Executive Director, Food Corporation of ...
Case Number: 627
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2018
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUMEET GOEL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No : 626 of 2017Date of Institution: 22.05.2017 Date of Decision: 20.03.20181. Managing Director, Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Bara Khamba Lane, New Delhi.2. Executive Director, Food Corporation of ...
Case Number: 626
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2018
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUMEET GOEL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No : 625 of 2017Date of Institution: 22.05.2017 Date of Decision: 20.03.20181. Managing Director, Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Bara Khamba Lane, New Delhi.2. Executive Director, Food Corporation of ...
Case Number: 625
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2018
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUMIT GOEL
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. A/1005/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/09/2016 in Case No. 98/2013 of District Hisar)1. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA16-20, BARA KHAMBA LANE,NEW DELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SOBHA RANI LAMBAWD/O BALJIT SINGH LAMBA D/O SH.NARENDER SINGH LOHAN...
Case Number: 1005
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2018
Food Corporation Of India Food Narender Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUMEET GOEL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No : 931 & 1004 of 2016Date of Institution: 06.10.2016 & 21.10.2016 Date of Decision: 29.11.2017First Appeal No.931 of 20161. Sh. Jai Bhagwan Ladwal, Member, Manager of FCI Staff Coop. Urban (SE) ...
Case Number: 1004
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2018
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUMEET GOEL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1006 of 2016Date of Institution: 21.10.2016Date of Decision : 29.11.2017Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Bara Khamba Lane, New Delhi through Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office...
Case Number: 1006
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2018
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: Etah
Appelant Advocate LAKSHMIKANT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate SHIV SHANKAR AGRAWAL
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2017
Food Corporation Of India Food
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUYODHAN BYRAPANENI & MS. TATINI BASU
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3363 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 28/07/2016 in Appeal No. 297/2015 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. RAMISETTY RAVINDRANATHS/O. VENKAIAH R/O. H.NO. 26-1-498, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, N.G.O. COL...
Case Number: 3363
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Food Corporation Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Food Corporation Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Food Corporation Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.