Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,KANNURComplaint Case No. CC/103/20121. Chandran N, Kizhakedath House,PO Karimbam, 670142 KannurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Century Fashion City, Thaliparamba, Chiravaku, 670142KannurKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORAB...
Case Number: 103
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/422/20111. K.APPUKKUTTANKALLIDUMPIL HOUSE, PUTHUKKOD PO, RAMANATUKARA[VIA], MALAPPURAM DIST............Complainant(s)Versus1. PREMIER FASHION JEWELLERS, NEAR BUS STAND BUILDING , RAMANATUKARA 673633.2. PREMIER MAGIC COOK, PREMIER FASHION COMPLEX, RAILWAY LIN...
Case Number: 422
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Fashion Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S G MAHAMUNI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/2321. KUVAM INTRNATIONAL FASHION LTD310 LAXMI SADAN ZAVER ROAD MULUND WEST MUMBAI 400080MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK BR...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ahmedabad City
Appelant Advocate S J MEHTA
Respondant Advocate L K BHAYA
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2019
Court Name: Kollam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Civil Station,KollamKeralaCC NO. 177 Of 20111. Balasundaram, Kollamthara kizhakathil, Meenadu village, Kollam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Proprietor, Kammees the Fashion Shoppy, Ladies and Gents Childrens, Convent Road, Kollam .............
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIBHA DATTA MAKHIJA & MR. S.K. PRUTHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3624 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 12/09/2007 in Appeal No. 516/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FASHION TECHNOLOGY & ANR.(MINISTRY OF TEXTILES, GOVT. OF INDIA) NIFT CAMPUS...
Case Number: 3624
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2007
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIBHHA DATTA MAKHIJA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4073 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 09/12/2007 in Appeal No. 51/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FASHION TECHNOLOGY & ANR ( MINISTRY OF TEXTILES, GOVT. OF INDIA ), NIFT CAMD...
Case Number: 4073
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2012
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 47 Of 20121. M.K.VIJAYAKUMAR"VAISHNAVAM", NOCHATTUTHAZHAM ROAD, VENGERI PO, KOZHIKODE 673010............Complainant(s)Versus1. PROPRIETOR, EXPLOD FASHION P.M.K TOWER, CIVIL STATION, PALATTUTHAZHAM, CALICUT 673020.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan,...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/6101. BEENANADAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHIRAKKAKAM, VARAPPUZHA P.O, 683517...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SHEETAL FASHION DESIGN MANAGER, CONVENT JUNCTION, ERNAKULAM - PIN- 682035............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENTHONORABLE MR. P...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 308 of 2011 1. NIFD Institute of FashionSCO 32-35, Sector 8/C, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Pro-Eye Protection World (Pvt.) Ltd,through its Director, Anoop Singh, SCO No. 126-127, (2nd Floor), Sector 34,...
Case Number: 308
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Fashion in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Fashion ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Fashion under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.