company-name-logo

Fashion

Latest Judgments

Total 1397 Consumer Court Cases Against Fashion.

Chandigarh

Kapsons Fashion Pvt. Ltd. V/S Surinder Singh Soni

Fashion  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Rajni Narula Adv. & Rajesh Narang Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated : 18/05/2016ORDER Sh. Rajesh Narang, counsel for the complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately: - “Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves his right t...

Case Number: 339

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Punjab

Sorabh Sharma V/S Planet Fashion

Fashion  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Pankaj Bali

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 189

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 26-05-2016

Rajasthan

U.I.I.CO. LTD. V/S JAI HANUMAN FASHION PVT. LTD.

Fashion  

Court Name: Barmer

Appelant Advocate SEEMA MANDOT

Respondant Advocate C P GUPTA

Case Number: 93

|

Date of Filing: 02-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 12-05-2016

Rajasthan

MODERN FASHION V/S BHARAT PARJAPAT

Fashion  

Court Name: Jaipur-II

Appelant Advocate R.K.Verma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 944

|

Date of Filing: 22-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 19-05-2016

Rajasthan

Monte Carlo Fashion Ltd. V/S 373/2016 Smt. Savita Jain

Fashion  

Court Name: Ganganagar

Appelant Advocate Mahadev Middha

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 29-04-2016

Uttarakhand

The Managing Director,M/s Chhabra 555 fashion Pvt.Ltd. V/S Suman Saini

Fashion  

Court Name: Dehradun

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 149

|

Date of Filing: 22-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-04-2016

Chandigarh

M/s Kapsons Fashion Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rajesh Kumar

Fashion  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

Before the Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 66 OF 2016Rajesh Kumar Vs M/s Kapsons Fashion Pvt. Ltd.BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBER ASHOK RAJ BHANDARI, MEMBER/LOK ADALATPRES...

Case Number: 66

|

Date of Filing: 29-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2016

Chandigarh

M/s Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Pvt. Ltd., V/S Mandeep Singh Dhillion

Fashion  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated : 08/04/2016ORDER This case is taken up today on the written request of the parties. Sh. Mandeep Singh Dhillon, complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately: - “The OPs have redressed my grievance and the matter has now been amicably settled betwe...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 06-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Orissa

Sri Prakash Chandra Panigrahi, Proprietor, Prakash Fashion Point V/S Sri Nabin Sahu

Fashion  

Court Name: Koraput

Appelant Advocate Sri Sunil Kumar Mohanty

Respondant Advocate None

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM KORAPUT AT JEYPORE,ODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/15/911. Sri Nabin SahuAt/Po/Via- Ambaguda KoraputOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sri Prakash Chandra Panigrahi, Proprietor, Prakash Fashion PointM.G. Road, At/PO- Jeypore,KoraputOdish...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 28-12-2016

Karnataka

The Branch Manager M/s. Alankar Fashion RR Silk V/S Suman Kotnala

Fashion  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/15/18101. Suman KotnalaP-4/2, Gunta Vihar, Min of Defence DGQA Residential Complex, JC Nagar PO, Bengaluru-006............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Branch Ma...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 13-04-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Fashion in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Fashion ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Fashion under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.