Fashion
Latest Judgments
Total 1397 Consumer Court Cases Against Fashion.
The Proprietor Fashion Mobiles and Two others V/S M.Midhun
Court Name: Madurai
Appelant Advocate S.Rajendran
Respondant Advocate B.Rajesh
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2017
Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Ltd. V/S Dharminder Talwar
Fashion Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Deepinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/17/5611. Dharminder Talwar445/VI-3, Majith Mandi, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Ltd.Trillium Ma...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2017
Manager, H.R. Fashion V/S Manoj Dewangan
Court Name: Durg
Appelant Advocate Mr. Rajnish
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2017
Mr. Satish Setty- Assistant General Manager Marketing, Vogue Institute of Fashion Technology, V/S Mr. Cornelio Sushil Gabriel, (Father of Sasan Sushil),
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Party in Person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1333
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2017
MS. RUBY GOEL. V/S NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FASHION TECHNOLOGY AND ANR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision: 06.11.2017First Appeal No. 516/2007(Arising out of the order dated 30.11.2006 passed in Complaint Case No. 709/2006 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Foru...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2017
Luxmi Fashion World V/S Maninder
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Meenakshi Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh.R.K Raga
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 79/171. Maninder Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Luxmi Fashion WorldKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Meenakshi Sharma, Advocate For the Opp. ...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-11-2017
M/s A to Z Fashion Pvt. Ltd., V/S Paramjit Kaur
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Vikas Verma, Area Sales Manager of OP has handed a cheque of Rs.2288/- to the counsel for the complainant towards full and final settlement of the claim, which has been duly received by her. Copy of the same has been retained on the file. In this view of the matter the c...
Case Number: 185
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2017
Prop.Shan Saheb and Md Kasem Saheb,Variety Fashion association Pvt Ltd. V/S Tarun Kr Mondal, S/O G.Mondal
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
The complainant and O.P No. 5 file hazira. The petition dated 31.08.17 filed by the complainant is taken up for hearing treating the same as Mis. Case No. 26/2017.Heard both sides, objection is raised.We find that the proposed amendment is formal in nature and liable to be allowe...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2017
M/S A to Z Fashion V/S Vishavdeep Kalra
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 139 OF 2017in CC/570/2016Vishavdeep Kalra Vs M/s A to Z Fashion and Ors. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Complainant/DH in person.Sh.Vikas Verma, A...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2017
THE COCHIN FASHION JEWELLERY V/S K O JOHN
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P V VARGHESE
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION SISUVIHARLANE VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAMREVISION PETITION NO. 56/17 ORDER DATED : 04.10.2017PRESENTJUSTICE SHRI.S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN : PRESIDENTSRI.V.V.JOSE : MEMBERREVISIONPETITIONERE.O John, aged 90, S/o Late Ouseph, Kot...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Fashion in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Fashion ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Fashion under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.