Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. 2007/5871. JAY SHIV SHAKTI CO.OP.HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. PLOT NO. 337/B, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU ROAD,MULUND (W)MUMBAI 70...........Compla...
Case Number: 2007
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U V SINGH
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/10/99(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/04/2010 in Case No. 750/09 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. KANCHANJANGA LOK EVEREST J S D ROAD MULUND W MUMBAIMUMBAI MAHARASHTRA ..........
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate C.K.rathnakaran
Respondant Advocate
CDRF,KannurCDRF,KannurComplaint Case No. OP/262/2004 1. Fr.JoyThuruthel Vicer,San Jos Church,kelakam,kannur.670674 ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Everest Industries Ltd. Regd Office,ACC Ltd,Reserch and Consultancy,Directorate,CRS Complex,LBS Marg,Thane ,Maharashtra 2. Paulson ...
Case Number: 262
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ahmednagar
Appelant Advocate Adv. P. V. Joshi
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2019
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
CC/11/1District Consumer Forum, NagpurComplaint Case No. CC/10/518 1. Shri Govind Sadashiv MeshramPlot No. 29, Shaktimatanagar, Kharbi Road, Hasanbagh, NagpurNagpurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. The Everest Sahakari Pat Sanstha MaryaditGeeta Mandir Complex, Cotton M...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Firoz Khan
Respondant Advocate
CC/11/1District Consumer Forum, NagpurComplaint Case No. CC/10/493 1. Dr. Sagar Madan PandeGanjipeth, near Tata Parsi School, NagpurNagpurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. The Everest Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit45,46, 2nd Floor, Geeta Mandir complex, Subhash Road, Na...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Firoz Khan
Respondant Advocate
CC/11/1District Consumer Forum, NagpurComplaint Case No. CC/10/494 1. Smt. Shakuntala Madan PandeR/o. Ganjipeth, near Tata Parsi School, NagpurNagpurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. The Everest Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit45,46, 2nd Floor, Geeta Mandir complex, Subha...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.K.Bassi
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. A/09/610(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/06/2009 in Case No. OP 722/02 of District Trissur)1. Achankulangara Devaswom Siva TempleKerala...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Eternit Everest Ltd.Kerala...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: SRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR PRESIDING MEMBER...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Firoj Khan
Respondant Advocate ADV.D.B.DHOBE
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPUR.District Consumer Forum, 5th Floor, New Administrative Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001Complaint Case No. CC/10/416 1. Ku. Sapana Madan PandeNagpur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. The Everest Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U.B.Wavikar
Respondant Advocate Ravindra N.More
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/10/85(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/06/2010 in Case No. 37/2010 of District Raigarh) 1. SAI EVEREST DEVELOPERS & ORSOFFICENO 63 VIGHNAHAR COMPLEX OPP NAVRANG RESTORANT PLO...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Everest in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Everest ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Everest under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.